| |
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
99 Park Avenue, 12th Floor New York, New York 10016 (212) 659-0600 MCBankNY.com |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Sincerely,
Mark R. DeFazio
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 20, 2026
|
|
| |
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
99 Park Avenue, 12th Floor New York, New York 10016 (212) 659-0600 MCBankNY.com |
| |
|
|
| |
|
| |
DATE
|
| |
|
| |
VIRTUAL MEETING
|
| |
|
| |
RECORD DATE
|
|
| |
April 29, 2026
9:00 a.m., Eastern Time |
| | Go online to www.meetnow.global/MWTWSXQ | | | The record date for stockholders entitled to vote their shares at the Annual Meeting is March 4, 2026 | | |||||||||
| |
Agenda for the Annual Meeting
|
| |
Board
Recommendation |
| ||||||
| |
1.
|
| |
Election of four directors to serve on our Board of Directors (the “Board” or “Board of Directors”) for a three year term ending at the 2029 Annual Meeting;
|
| |
|
| |
FOR each director nominee
|
|
| |
2.
|
| |
Approval of a non-binding advisory vote regarding the 2025 compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Proxy Statement (“Say-on-Pay” vote);
|
| |
|
| |
FOR
|
|
| |
3.
|
| |
Ratification of the appointment of Crowe LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2026;
|
| |
|
| |
FOR
|
|
| |
4.
|
| |
Approval of 2026 Employee Stock Purchase Plan; and
|
| |
|
| |
FOR
|
|
| |
5.
|
| |
Such other matters as may properly come before the Company at the Annual Meeting, or any adjournments thereof. At this time, the Board is not aware of any other business to come before the Company at the Annual Meeting.
|
| | | | | | |
| |
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE
AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BY: |
| ||||||
| |
|
| |
INTERNET
|
| |
Go to
www.investorvote.com/MCB |
|
| |
|
| |
PHONE
|
| |
Call toll-free
1 (800) 652-VOTE (8683) |
|
| |
|
| |
MAIL
|
| |
Complete, sign, date and return your proxy card in the postage-paid envelope
|
|
| |
|
| |
ATTEND
THE MEETING |
| |
Attend virtually and vote online during the meeting
|
|
| |
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE
AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING |
|
| |
The Proxy Statement, Proxy Card
and Annual Report are available at www.edocumentview.com/MCB |
|
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | |
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | |
| |
|
| |
We are asking stockholders to elect four (4) director nominees named in this Proxy Statement to serve on our Board for a three (3) year term ending at the 2029 Annual Meeting, or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. The Board, on recommendation from its Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (the “CG&N Committee”), has nominated each of:
•
Anthony J. Fabiano,
•
Robert C. Patent,
•
Maria Fiorini Ramirez, and
•
William Reinhardt
for election as a director for a three (3) year term.
|
|
| |
|
| |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE DIRECTOR NOMINEES.
|
|
| |
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
|
| | | | | |
Director Nominees with
Terms Ending in 2026 |
| | |
Continuing Directors with
Terms Ending in 2027 |
| | |
Continuing Directors with
Terms Ending in 2028 |
|
| | | | |
•
Anthony J. Fabiano
•
Robert C. Patent
•
Maria Fiorini Ramirez
•
William Reinhardt
|
| | |
•
Mark R. DeFazio
•
Harvey M. Gutman
•
Katrina Robinson
•
George J. Wolf, Jr.
|
| | |
•
Dale C. Fredston
•
David J. Gold
•
Terence J. Mitchell
•
Chaya Pamula
|
|
| |
Anthony J. Fabiano
|
| |
Independent | Director Since 2020 | Chair Since 2025
|
| ||||
| |
Age 65
Committees
•
Audit (Chair)
•
Compensation
•
Risk
|
| | |
Career Highlights
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. and Metropolitan Commercial Bank
•
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (2018 to 2020)
Hudson City Bancorp
•
President, Chief Operating Officer and a member of the Board of Directors (2014 to 2015)
•
Executive Vice President — Finance and Administration (2012 to 2014)
Sound Federal Bancorp
•
Chief Financial Officer (1998 to 2006)
MSB Bancorp
•
Chief Financial Officer (1992 to 1998)
Education
•
B.S., Manhattan College
|
| |
Qualifications
Mr. Fabiano has more than 40 years of experience across a broad range of finance, accounting and management disciplines, primarily in the banking sector. He is a Certified Public Accountant, a member of the American Institute of CPAs and the New York State Society of CPAs and attended the National School of Banking at Fairfield University.
Skills and Expertise
•
Extensive expertise in a broad range of banking, financial, accounting and risk management matters.
•
Senior leadership managing the finance and operations functions at publicly traded financial institutions.
•
Knowledge of the company’s business and operations.
|
|
| |
Robert C. Patent
|
| |
Independent | Director Since 1999
|
| ||||
| |
Age 75
Committees
•
Compensation
|
| | |
Career Highlights
Colby Capital Corporation, a private investment firm focused on real estate acquisition, financing and restructuring
•
President (1991 to 2025)
New York Federal Savings Bank
•
Director (1989 to 1997)
Education
•
B.B.A., The George Washington University
|
| |
Qualifications
Mr. Patent has over 50 years of experience in real estate investment. His board experience includes service as a director of New York Federal Savings Bank from 1989 until its sale to Flushing Financial Corporation in 1997.
Skills and Expertise
•
Prior experience on the board of a financial institution.
•
Deep expertise in real estate investment.
•
Knowledge of the Company’s market and the real estate industry.
|
|
| |
Maria Fiorini Ramirez
|
| |
Independent | Director Since 2014
|
| ||||
| |
Age 77
Committees
•
Audit
•
CG&N
•
Risk
|
| | |
Career Highlights
Maria Fiorini Ramirez, Inc., a global economic and financial consulting firm
•
Founder, President and CEO (1992 to Present)
Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated
•
Managing Director and Money Market Economist
Education
•
B.A., Pace University
|
| |
Qualifications
Ms. Ramirez has significant board experience in the banking industry, serving as director at several companies between 1989 and 2009, including Sovereign Bancorp, Independence Community Bank and Statewide Savings Bank. Ms. Ramirez currently serves as a director of Security Mutual Life and The Brooklyn Hospital.
Skills and Expertise
•
Significant prior experience on the boards of community and regional banks.
•
Expertise in finance and economics.
•
Experience in financial regulation and risk management.
|
|
| |
William Reinhardt
|
| |
Independent | Director Since 2013
|
| ||||
| |
Age 79
Committees
•
Risk
|
| | |
Career Highlights
Alvarez & Marsal
•
Senior Director (2008 to 2025)
Office of Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”)
•
Assistant Deputy Comptroller for Community Banks, Northeast District
Education
•
Degree from the Graduate School of Banking, University of Wisconsin
•
B.A., LIU Post (formerly known as C.W. Post Campus of Long Island University)
|
| |
Qualifications
Mr. Reinhardt served as Chair of the Board from 2018 until September 2025. While at the OCC, Mr. Reinhardt was responsible for regulatory oversight over more than 200 community and regional banks as well as federal branches. He served on numerous interagency committees to identify and address emerging issues in an effective manner.
Skills and Expertise
•
Significant expertise in financial regulation and supervision.
•
Financial expert, with experience in banking, risk management and compliance.
•
Senior policy-making experience in public sector.
|
|
| |
Mark R. DeFazio
|
| |
President and CEO | Director Since 1999
|
| ||||
| |
Age 62
Committees
None
|
| | |
Career Highlights
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. and
Metropolitan Commercial Bank
•
Chief Executive Officer (appointed 2002 to Present)
•
Founder and President (1999 to Present)
Israel Discount Bank
•
Various positions, including Senior Vice President and Head of Commercial Real Estate (13 years)
|
| |
Qualifications
Mr. DeFazio has more than 40 years of experience banking and real estate experience. Mr. DeFazio has overseen the steady growth of the Bank from its founding in 1999, to its initial public offering in 2017 and through to the present.
Skills and Expertise
•
Deep familiarity with the markets and communities in which the Company operates.
•
Broad and extensive expertise in banking and real estate.
•
Senior leadership of a publicly traded financial institution.
|
|
| |
Harvey M. Gutman
|
| |
Independent | Director Since 2008
|
| ||||
| |
Age 79
Committees
•
Compensation
•
Risk
|
| | |
Career Highlights
Brookside Advisors, LLC, a real estate consulting and development company
•
Founder and President (2006 to Present)
Pathmark Stores, Inc.
•
Senior Vice President for Retail Development (16 years)
•
VP for Grocery, Non-Food and Rx Merchandising (7 years)
•
VP of Strategic Planning, Research and Investor Relations (7 years)
Education
•
M.B.A., Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania
•
B.A., Rutgers University
|
| |
Qualifications
Mr. Gutman has been active in real estate and retail development since 1990. At Pathmark, he was responsible for the company’s retail development program, including site identification. He was additionally responsible for investor communications and public relations. Mr. Gutman currently serves on the board of two ARCTRUST private REITs and is a member of the International Council of Shopping Centers.
Skills and Expertise:
•
Significant background in retail and real estate.
•
Expertise in strategic planning in the real estate industry.
•
Senior executive and board experience.
|
|
| |
Katrina Robinson
|
| |
Independent | Director Since 2021
|
| ||||
| |
Age 43
Committees
•
Audit
•
CG&N
|
| | |
Career Highlights
Cone Marshall Group, an international trust and fiduciary services firm
•
CEO (2022 to Present)
Teton Trust Company LLC, a Wyoming chartered trust and fiduciary services firm
•
CEO (2017 to Present)
Education
•
J.D., Benjamin Cardozo School of Law
•
MPhil, University of Cambridge
•
B.A., Princeton University
|
| |
Qualifications
Ms. Robinson is an expert in trusts, succession planning and governance, including in the cross-border context. A lawyer admitted to practice in New York state, Ms. Robinson’s previous legal experience includes working with private family offices and ultra-high net worth clients. She also worked as a portfolio manager in international wealth management in New York.
Skills and Expertise
•
Expertise in wealth management and trust and estate planning.
•
Significant international business experience.
•
Successful entrepreneurial background servicing family offices and private clients.
|
|
| |
George J. Wolf, Jr.
|
| |
Independent | Director Since 2001
|
| ||||
| |
Age 73
Committees
•
Compensation (Chair)
•
CG&N
|
| | |
Career Highlights
Aon Risk Solutions
•
Managing Director and the Head of the Law Firm Advisory Team (2018 to 2024)
Herrick, Feinstein, law firm
•
Managing Director, member of Executive Committee (1993 to 2017)
Education
•
B.S., Villanova University
|
| |
Qualifications
Mr. Wolf led the Law Advisory practice at Aon Risk Solutions, providing industry-specific experience to help law firm leaders identify and implement operational improvements for financial stability and growth. At Herrick Feinstein, Mr. Wolf was responsible for the firm’s financial, administrative and strategic planning.
Mr. Wolf founded and is the Chairman and President of The Greg Wolf Fund, a charitable organization that was established in memory of his son, Gregory, who lost his battle to leukemia in 2005. The fund supports patients and their families in their fight against all blood cancers and has funded numerous blood cancer research initiatives.
Skills and Expertise
•
Experience with financial and strategic planning and implementation.
•
Senior policy-making position at a professional services firm.
•
Significant philanthropic and non-profit experience.
|
|
| |
Dale C. Fredston
|
| |
Independent | Director Since 2016
|
| ||||
| |
Age 73
Committees
•
Audit
•
CG&N (Chair)
|
| | |
Career Highlights
Sterling National Bank and its public holding company, Sterling Bancorp
•
Executive Vice President and General Counsel (2002 to 2015)
Bank of America
•
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of the bank’s commercial finance subsidiary
Education
•
J.D., Columbia University School of Law
•
B.A., Wellesley College
|
| |
Qualifications
Ms. Fredston has over 30 years of experience as in-house counsel to a wide range of financial service companies. Her experience includes financing transactions, mergers and acquisitions, banking and securities law, risk management, corporate governance, general corporate matters and management of litigation.
Skills and Expertise
•
Deep industry knowledge and expertise in bank-specific legal, regulatory and compliance matters.
•
Senior leadership of a publicly traded financial institution.
•
Experience in finance and risk management.
|
|
| |
David J. Gold
|
| |
Independent | Director Since 2016
|
| ||||
| |
Age 51
Committees
•
Compensation
•
CG&N
•
Risk
|
| | |
Career Highlights
AdvisIRy Partners Group LLC, consulting firm providing strategic and capital markets advisory services
•
Partner (2017 to Present)
City of New York
•
New York City Commissioner of City Planning (appointed in 2022)
Education
•
J.D., Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law
•
B.S., New York University Stern School of Business
|
| |
Qualifications
Mr. Gold was an equity analyst at a Wall Street firm for nearly two decades. Professional certifications and memberships include:
•
Chartered Financial Analyst and member of the CFA Institute
•
Cyber Oversight CERT certificate (Software Engineering Institute of Carnegie Mellon University)
•
National Association of Corporate Directors (member)
•
Licensed Real Estate Broker and member of the Real Estate Board of New York
Skills and Expertise
•
Experience in strategic planning and investor relations.
•
Expertise in capital markets and credit analysis.
•
Knowledge of the Company’s market and the real estate industry.
|
|
| |
Terence J. Mitchell
|
| |
Independent | Director Since 2017
|
| ||||
| |
Age 73
Committees
•
Audit
•
CG&N
•
Risk (Chair)
|
| | |
Career Highlights
Dime Community Bank/Dime Community Bankshares
•
Executive Vice President and Chief Retail Officer (2010 to 2016)
Sovereign Bank
•
Executive Vice President, Director of Retail Banking (2006 to 2008)
Independence Community Bank/Independence Community Bank Corp.
•
Executive Vice President, President of Consumer Banking (1990 to 2006)
Education
•
B.B.A., Iona College
|
| |
Qualifications
Mr. Mitchell has over 40 years of experience in retail banking. He has a deep knowledge of the communities and markets in which we operate and has also served on the boards of several Brooklyn non-profit and public interest organizations.
Skills and Expertise
•
Extensive retail and consumer banking expertise.
•
Senior leadership of business units at publicly traded financial institutions.
•
Experience in risk management and operations.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Chaya Pamula
|
| |
Independent | Director Since 2021
|
| ||||
| |
Age 60
Committees
•
Audit
•
Risk
|
| | |
Career Highlights
PamTen Inc., technology services provider
•
Co-founder, President and CEO (2007 to Present)
SheTek, non-profit focused on increasing women representation in technology industry
•
Founder and President (2017 to Present)
SOFKIN, non-profit focused on serving the needs of underprivileged children
•
Founder and Trustee (2005 to Present)
Education
•
Executive Education Program, Harvard Business School
•
MBA, Osmania University in India
|
| |
Qualifications
Ms. Pamula has more than 25 years of information technology experience, with a focus on solutions for business process improvement, business transformation/ reengineering and IT portfolio optimization. She is engaged and versed in emerging areas of technology, such as artificial intelligence. Ms. Pamula is on the board of various industry associations, social impact organizations, and has received awards for her philanthropy, entrepreneurship, and dedication to non-for-profit endeavors.
Skills and Expertise
•
Extensive expertise in information technology, cybersecurity and emerging technologies (e.g., artificial intelligence).
•
Experience in entrepreneurship and serving small- and medium-sized enterprises.
•
Experience with business transformation through integration of digital technology solutions.
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| |
Skill
|
| | |
# of Directors
|
| ||||||
| |
|
| |
Industry Knowledge
|
| |
Experience in banking, financial services, lending, payments, and fintech
|
| | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Financial Expertise/
Accounting/Auditing |
| |
Experience in finance, accounting, financial reporting and/or auditing
|
| | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Commercial Real Estate Knowledge
|
| |
Expertise in real estate markets and financing
|
| | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Strategic Planning
|
| |
Experience in establishing strategic pillars and measurable objectives and developing roadmaps for driving organizations into the future
|
| | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Executive Experience
|
| |
Experience as a CEO and/or a Department or Business Head
|
| | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Risk Management
|
| |
Experience in management of business risk and regulatory and compliance frameworks at a complex organization
|
| | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Technology/Information Security/Cybersecurity
|
| |
Knowledge of cybersecurity, innovative technology and information technology
|
| | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Community Development and Corporate Responsibility
|
| |
Experience with community development, corporate responsibility and other public policy matters
|
| | |
|
|
| |
|
| |
Human Capital Management
|
| |
Experience in hiring and retaining the right people, managing a workforce effectively and optimizing productivity
|
| | |
|
|
| |
|
| | |
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
99 Park Avenue, 12th Floor New York, New York 10016 Attention: Investor Relations |
| |
|
| | |
investors.mcbankny.com/governance/
documents |
|
| |
1
|
| |
Enhancing and scaling our risk management framework,
|
|
| |
2
|
| |
Driving the Company’s digital transformation and enhancing its information technology infrastructure,
|
|
| |
3
|
| |
Continuing to develop a best-in-class talent driven organization, and
|
|
| |
4
|
| |
Executing on core commercial banking activities in a disciplined, high-performance fashion.
|
|
| |
MANAGEMENT SUCCESSION
|
| | |
DIRECTOR SUCCESSION
|
|
| |
•
The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines emphasize the Board’s role in senior leadership succession planning to facilitate long-term, resilient and sustainable business practices.
•
Succession Plan — At least on an annual basis, the Board reviews the Company’s management succession plan with the CEO. The succession plan includes the CEO’s recommendations regarding interim succession candidates for each other member of the senior management team.
•
Emergency Succession — The Company’s succession plan includes a CEO emergency succession management plan.
•
Talent Evaluation and Development — The Compensation Committee reviews and regularly evaluates the performance of key personnel, such as department heads and key functional leaders, in addition to the Company’s executive officers. Moreover, the Board has prioritized its development of relationships with leaders across the organization by encouraging employees outside the executive management team to attend formal, in-boardroom sessions as well as to engage with the Board in informal settings. The Board considers its engagement with non-executive employees as an important tool in evaluating the rank and readiness of potential internal succession candidates while supporting the Company’s talent development goals more broadly.
|
| | |
•
The CG&N Committee leads the Board’s director succession planning efforts, including through its periodic evaluation of the Board’s composition, committee assignments and consideration of director candidates for election to the Board.
•
As part of this process, the CG&N Committee periodically reviews the current and anticipated needs of the Board and its committees and identifies potential successors for each committee, taking into account director qualifications, committee charters, and rotation practices.
•
The Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines also contemplated the appointment of a Vice Chair of the Board, as needed, to assist in the succession planning process including by facilitating orderly leadership transitions and supporting Board continuity.
•
As discussed further in the Board Structure and Leadership section below, the Board successfully implemented its succession plan through the transition of the independent Chair role from Mr. Reinhardt to Mr. Fabiano. This transition, which occurred in the third quarter of 2025, reflects the comprehensiveness and effectiveness of the Board’s governance framework and succession process.
|
|
| |
|
| |
INITIAL DESIGN
|
| |
|
| | |
|
| |
QUESTIONNAIRES
|
| |
|
| | |
|
| |
THIRD-PARTY
FACILITATOR |
| |
|
|
| |
Each year, the CG&N Committee, in consultation with the Board chair, determines the process, scope and contents of the Board’s annual performance evaluation.
|
| | |
Feedback is solicited through a set of comprehensive questionnaires.
•
Each director completes a separate questionnaire for the full Board and each committee on which they serve.
•
The questionnaires are structured to elicit feedback on key aspects of Board performance, including effectiveness of the Board and the Company’s governance practices and framework, director contribution, and management and Board dynamics. The Board also completes questionnaires that specifically focus on the performance of the CEO and Board Chair.
|
| | |
To ensure objectivity and anonymity and encourage candor on the part of the directors, a third-party facilitator is engaged to distribute the evaluation materials, compile results, and provide a comprehensive analysis of the feedback.
The reports compiled by the third-party facilitator include recommended adjustments to governance practices and Board processes as well as insights and, as applicable, comparisons of the Board’s feedback on its performance against industry standards and peer benchmarks.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| |
|
| |
REVIEW OF
FINDINGS |
| |
|
| | |
|
| |
FOLLOW-UP AND
ONGOING FEEDBACK |
| |
|
| | |
|
| |
KEY
EVALUATION TOPICS |
| | | |
| |
The CG&N Committee reviews the reports on the results for the Board and each committee in executive session.
•
The reports and any additional findings or discussion points identified by the CG&N Committee are then presented to the full Board for further discussion in an executive session of the full Board.
•
Each standing committee self-evaluation is also reviewed by the respective committee Chair in executive session of such committee.
|
| | |
The Board and management (at the Board’s direction) work together to take appropriate action in light of the results of the self-evaluation.
•
The reports provide a comparison of results to the prior year, which allows the Board to track improvements and promote long-term accountability.
•
Directors are periodically solicited for feedback throughout the year, and are generally encouraged to provide input and make suggestions for enhancements throughout the year, including with respect to the quality and timing of meeting materials and meeting logistics.
|
| | |
Topics identified in the evaluation results include:
•
Strategic priorities for focusing Board oversight.
•
Succession planning.
•
Board structure, composition, and schedule.
•
Committee structure, responsibilities and performance.
•
Quality, timeliness, and relevance of information provided by management.
•
Training and Board education programs.
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| |
IN-BOARDROOM SESSIONS
|
| | |
EXTERNALLY FACILITATED PROGRAMS
|
| | |
MATERIAL ACCESS & PROGRAM DESIGN
|
|
| |
•
Education sessions led by members of senior management or outside experts and advisors are made available to the directors on the agendas for regular Board and committee meetings.
•
Topics covered during these sessions include:
•
updates on economic or market events, including banking industry trends and policy developments,
•
developments in emerging strategic and business priorities, such as artificial intelligence, and
•
risk management and compliance, information technology and cybersecurity matters.
|
| | |
•
On an ongoing basis, directors are provided with a catalogue of continuing education programs covering a range of topics, including bank-specific risk and compliance matters, and information technology and cybersecurity, that are delivered through nationally recognized educational organizations.
•
As discussed in the Board’s Role in Risk Oversight section below, the directors joined the Company’s senior management team for a multi-session executive education program on artificial intelligence.
•
Directors are also provided access to online, self-directed training modules delivered through our corporate training platform.
|
| | |
•
Materials related to these informational sessions are maintained and catalogued for a director’s future reference (or for new directors, for use as part of the onboarding package).
•
Additional education materials and articles of interest are provided to directors on a periodic basis.
•
Directors are encouraged, including in the annual Board and committee evaluation process, to provide feedback regarding topics they would like to cover in continuing education sessions.
|
|
| |
|
| | | |
| | Ensuring continuity and stability of leadership | | | which further enhances the quality of guidance the Board can provide management in the context of a complex, highly-regulated and dynamic business environment. | |
| | Perpetuating directors’ long-term perspectives and decision-making | | | to support robust operations and sustainable business growth, which improves alignment with shareholder interests. | |
| | Developing directors with deep institutional knowledge and experience with the Company | | | which enhances the directors’ level of engagement and ability to challenge management in a constructive manner. | |
| | Facilitating the Board’s director search and recruitment efforts | | | Particularly in light of the added scrutiny on community, smaller regional, and commercial banks following recent bank failures and past turmoil in the financial services industry, the classified board is an important tool in bolstering our ability to recruit and retain highly qualified directors. | |
| |
RISK COMMITTEE
|
| | |
AUDIT COMMITTEE
|
|
| |
•
Approve and oversee the risk appetite of the Company and the Bank and monitor alignment with corporate strategy.
•
Review and approve, and recommend to the Board for approval, the Risk Appetite Statement on an annual basis.
•
Oversee the risk governance structure, risk culture, and review and approve the significant risk management policies of the Company and the Bank.
•
Review regular reports from management on the significant enterprise risks and exposures, their impact on the enterprise risk profile, and steps that management has taken to measure, monitor and control such exposures.
•
Review reports from management regarding material issues identified by internal or external independent review functions, including internal audit, as well as significant regulatory examination reports and associated matters identified by regulatory authorities related to risk management and the risk governance structure.
|
| | |
•
Oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements.
•
Review the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements that may have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
•
Evaluate the independent auditors’ qualifications and independence.
•
Review of the performance of its internal audit and financial risk assessment function.
|
|
| |
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
|
| ||||
| |
•
Assess and monitor risks related to our compensation program, including alignment of incentives with sound business practices.
|
| ||||
| |
CG&N COMMITTEE
|
| ||||
| |
•
Oversight of the director qualification and nomination process.
•
Evaluate the performance and effectiveness of the Board.
•
Oversight of our corporate governance principles.
|
|
| |
Key Focus Areas
|
| |
MCB Developments
|
|
| |
Talent
|
| |
•
To advance the Company’s artificial intelligence-related objectives, management has made strategic investments in talent and leadership, including the appointment of a Chief Artificial Intelligence Officer responsible for developing and implementing the Company’s strategy, coordinating enterprise-wide artificial intelligence initiatives, and establishing appropriate governance as well as risk management frameworks.
|
|
| |
Governance and Reporting
|
| |
•
The Board and its relevant committees, primarily the Risk Committee, receive periodic reports from management regarding the Company’s artificial intelligence initiatives, including updates on strategic use cases, implementation progress, and key risks and controls. AI-related matters are integrated into the Company’s enterprise risk management processes, including through the establishment of several cross-disciplinary working groups, and are reflected in the regular risk reports and dashboards reviewed by the Risk Committee, thereby enabling concentrated oversight of AI-related risks and mitigation measures.
|
|
| |
Training and Development
|
| |
•
The Board participates in ongoing education and training programs designed to enhance directors’ understanding of artificial intelligence technologies, emerging trends, and related regulatory, ethical, and risk considerations. For example, to supplement management’s periodic reporting on artificial intelligence strategy and developments, the Board attended an immersive executive education program with the Company’s senior management team at a leading educational institution. Through these efforts, the Board believes it is well positioned to oversee the Company’s approach to artificial intelligence in support of the Company’s sustainable, risk conscious growth objectives.
|
|
| |
|
| | |
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
99 Park Avenue, 12th Floor New York, New York 10016 Attention: Corporate Secretary |
|
| |
Audit Committee
|
| | |
The Audit Committee assists the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities for general oversight of the integrity of the Company’s financial statements and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements that may have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. The Audit Committee, among other matters:
•
appoints, evaluates and determines the compensation and independence of the Company’s independent auditors;
•
reviews and pre-approves both audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the Company’s independent auditors;
•
reviews the quality and integrity of the Company’s financial statements;
•
reviews disclosure controls and procedures, internal controls, and corporate policies with respect to financial information;
•
oversees any investigations into complaints concerning financial matters; and
•
oversees the internal audit function, including approving all decisions regarding the appointment or removal of the Chief Internal Auditor and approving the annual internal audit plan.
The Audit Committee is comprised solely of members who satisfy the applicable independence and other SEC, NYSE and applicable bank regulatory requirements for audit committees and all such members have been determined to be independent by the Board. The Board has determined that Mr. Fabiano qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as that term is defined in the rules and regulations of the SEC.
|
|
| |
Committee Members*
•
Anthony Fabiano (Chair)
•
Dale Fredston
•
Terence Mitchell
•
Chaya Pamula
•
Maria Ramirez
•
Katrina Robinson
6 independent members
8 meetings in 2025 |
| |
| |
Compensation Committee
|
| | |
The Compensation Committee is responsible for discharging the Board’s responsibilities relating to the compensation of the Company’s executive officers and directors. The Compensation Committee, among other matters:
•
evaluates and modifies compensation strategies;
•
reviews and approves objectives relevant to executive officer compensation;
•
evaluates performance and recommends to the Board the compensation of the CEO and other executive officers in accordance with those objectives;
•
reviews and oversees the Company’s compensation and benefit plans;
•
recommends to the Board compensation for directors; and
•
prepares the Compensation Discussion and Analysis to be included in the Company’s proxy statements.
The Compensation Committee is comprised solely of members who satisfy the applicable independence requirements of the SEC and the NYSE and all such members have been determined to be independent by the Board. Our management provides information and recommendations for the Compensation Committee’s decision-making process regarding the amount and form of executive compensation, except that no member of management will participate in the decision-making process with respect to his or her own compensation. The “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” starting on page 33 of this Proxy Statement discusses the respective roles of our management and the Compensation Committee’s independent outside compensation advisor in determining and recommending executive compensation.
|
|
| |
Committee Members*
•
George Wolf (Chair)
•
Anthony Fabiano
•
Harvey Gutman
•
David Gold
•
Robert Patent
5 independent members
9 meetings in 2025 |
| |
| |
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
|
| | |
As further described on page 10 of this Proxy Statement, the CG&N Committee is responsible for making recommendations to the Board regarding candidates for directorships and determining the size and composition of the Board and its committees. In addition, the CG&N Committee, among other matters:
•
develops and recommends procedures for reviewing stockholder recommendations for director nominees;
•
designs and implements an annual evaluation to determine whether the Board and its committees are functioning effectively. Additional detail regarding the Board and committee effectiveness evaluation process is discussed on page 13.
•
considers, recommends and reviews policies, practices, systems and disclosures related to the Company’s general strategy on corporate responsibility, corporate governance, community involvement, and other public policy matters relevant to the Company;
•
reviews related party transactions, as required; and
•
develops and recommends any changes to the Corporate Governance Guidelines.
The CG&N Committee is comprised solely of members who satisfy the applicable independence requirements of the SEC and the NYSE and all such members have been determined to be independent by the Board.
|
|
| |
Committee Members*
•
Dale Fredston (Chair)
•
David Gold
•
Terence Mitchell
•
Maria Ramirez
•
Katrina Robinson
•
George Wolf
6 independent members
5 meetings in 2025 |
| |
| |
Risk Committee
|
| | |
The Risk Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in its oversight of the Company’s risks and risk appetite. See Board’s Role in Risk Oversight on page 18 of this Proxy Statement for a discussion of the Risk Committee’s duties and responsibilities.
The Risk Committee is comprised solely of non-management members, and a majority of members have been determined to be independent by our Board.
|
|
| |
Committee Members*
•
Terence Mitchell (Chair)
•
David Gold
•
Harvey Gutman
•
Anthony Fabiano
•
Chaya Pamula
•
Maria Ramirez
•
William Reinhardt
7 independent members
6 meetings in 2025 |
| |
| |
Credit Committee
|
| | |
The Credit Committee was responsible for the review and approval of certain loans of a type and over an amount as outlined in the Bank’s lending policies. The Credit Committee had 5 permanent members, including the Bank’s CEO, Mark DeFazio. Each of the other 7 directors on the Bank’s board of directors who are not ‘permanent members’ served as rotating members of the committee, with rotations occurring on a monthly basis.
Through its responsibilities, the frequency of meetings and the unique member rotation schedule, the Credit Committee allowed directors to gain an in-depth understanding of our credit activities, personnel and credit risk management practices, and supplemented management’s reporting to the Board on the quality and composition of the Bank’s credit portfolio and profile.
|
|
| |
Permanent Committee Members
•
Robert Patent (Chair)
•
Mark DeFazio
•
David Gold
•
Harvey Gutman
•
William Reinhardt
4 independent members
(1 management member)
Each other director serves
on the committee as a ‘rotating member’ with rotations occurring once a month in 2025 35 meetings in 2025 |
| |
| |
Asset Recovery Group Committee
|
| | |
The ARG Committee met with senior management to:
•
review loans of a certain risk rating,
•
review the Bank’s loan workout policies and procedures, and
•
evaluate and monitor action plans for certain individual credit risks.
The ARG Committee provided the board of directors of the Bank with a separate forum to provide guidance and constructive challenge to management, and actively monitor developments in the quality of the Bank’s most sensitive credits and relationships.
|
|
| |
Committee Members
•
Robert Patent (Chair)
•
Mark DeFazio
•
David Gold
•
Harvey Gutman
•
William Reinhardt
4 independent members
(1 management member) 4 meetings in 2025 |
| |
| |
Board/Committee
|
| |
Chair Retainer
($) |
| |
Per Meeting Fee
($) |
| ||||||
| | Board | | | |
|
75,000
|
| | | |
|
N/A
|
| |
| | Audit Committee | | | |
|
50,000
|
| | | |
|
5,000
|
| |
| | Compensation Committee | | | |
|
15,000
|
| | | |
|
4,000
|
| |
| | Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee | | | |
|
15,000
|
| | | |
|
4,000
|
| |
| | Risk Committee | | | |
|
35,000
|
| | | |
|
4,000
|
| |
| | Asset Recovery Group Committee (Bank Committee) | | | |
|
5,000
|
| | | |
|
3,500
|
| |
| | Credit Committee* (Bank Committee) | | | |
|
35,000
|
| | | |
|
7,500
|
| |
| |
Compensation Element
|
| |
Chair
Retainer |
| |
Per
Meeting Fee |
| |
Change from 2025
|
| ||||||
| | Board | | | |
$
|
65,000
|
| | |
N/A
|
| | Reduced Chair retainer from $75,000. | | |||
| | Audit Committee | | | |
$
|
25,000
|
| | | |
$
|
2,500
|
| | |
Reduced Chair retainer from $50,000 and per
meeting fee from $5,000. |
|
| | Compensation Committee | | | |
$
|
25,000
|
| | | |
$
|
2,500
|
| | | Increased Chair retainer from $15,000 and reduced per meeting fee from $4,000. | |
| | CG&N Committee | | | |
$
|
25,000
|
| | | |
$
|
2,500
|
| | | Increased Chair retainer from $15,000 and reduced per meeting fee from $4,000. | |
| | Risk Committee | | | |
$
|
25,000
|
| | | |
$
|
2,500
|
| | | Reduced Chair retainer from $35,000 and reduced per meeting fee from $4,000. | |
| |
Name
|
| |
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash
($) |
| |
Stock Awards(1)(2)
($) |
| |
Total
($) |
| |||||||||
| | Anthony J. Fabiano(3) | | | |
|
212,333
|
| | | |
|
164,475
|
| | | |
|
376,808
|
| |
| | Dale C. Fredston | | | |
|
105,000
|
| | | |
|
164,475
|
| | | |
|
269,475
|
| |
| | David J. Gold(4) | | | |
|
396,500
|
| | | |
|
164,475
|
| | | |
|
560,975
|
| |
| | Harvey M. Gutman(4) | | | |
|
276,500
|
| | | |
|
164,475
|
| | | |
|
440,975
|
| |
| | Terence J. Mitchell(5) | | | |
|
192,083
|
| | | |
|
164,475
|
| | | |
|
356,558
|
| |
| | Chaya Pamula | | | |
|
101,500
|
| | | |
|
164,475
|
| | | |
|
265,975
|
| |
| | Robert C. Patent(4) | | | |
|
372,500
|
| | | |
|
164,475
|
| | | |
|
536,975
|
| |
| | Maria F. Ramirez | | | |
|
114,000
|
| | | |
|
164,475
|
| | | |
|
278,475
|
| |
| | William Reinhardt(4)(6) | | | |
|
465,583
|
| | | |
|
164,475
|
| | | |
|
630,058
|
| |
| | Katrina Robinson | | | |
|
55,000
|
| | | |
|
164,475
|
| | | |
|
219,475
|
| |
| | George J. Wolf, Jr. | | | |
|
108,500
|
| | | |
|
164,475
|
| | | |
|
272,975
|
| |
| |
|
| |
Dixiana M. Berrios
|
|
| |
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
|
| |||
| |
Dixiana M. Berrios has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since July 2020. Before joining the Company, Ms. Berrios served as Executive Vice President and Director of Bank Operations of Amalgamated Bank from 2011 until 2020. Prior to her employment with Amalgamated Bank, Ms. Berrios served in several roles for Sterling National Bank from 1996 until 2011, including Senior Vice President and Director of Bank Operations. Ms. Berrios holds an MA from the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University and a BA from The University of Alabama. Age 53.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Laura Capra
|
|
| |
Executive Vice President and Head of Retail Banking
|
| |||
| |
Laura Capra has served as Executive Vice President and Head of Retail Banking since 2012. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Capra was a Senior Vice President, District Executive at Sovereign/Santander Bank from 2006 until 2012. Ms. Capra spent the early years of her career with Independence Community Bank. Ms. Capra attended Middlesex County College. Age 58.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Daniel Dougherty
|
|
| |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
| |||
| |
Daniel Dougherty has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since November 2023. Mr. Dougherty previously served as Treasurer since 2022. Prior to joining the Bank, Mr. Dougherty served as Executive Vice President and Treasurer at Investors Bank from 2016 to 2022. Mr. Dougherty is a Chartered Financial Analyst, received an MBA from St. John’s University and BA in Economics from Stony Brook University. Age 64.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Frederik F. Erikson
|
|
| |
Executive Vice President and General Counsel
|
| |||
| |
Frederik F. Erikson has served as Executive Vice President and General Counsel since September 2023. Mr. Erikson previously held several leadership roles at Webster Bank, N.A. over two decades, including Deputy General Counsel for nine years. He earned a JD from the Albany Law School of Union University and a BA from the State University of New York. Age 53.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Scott Lublin
|
|
| |
Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer
|
| |||
| |
Scott Lublin has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer since April 2018. From January 2013 to April 2018, Mr. Lublin served as Executive Vice President at BankUnited, where he managed their New York City commercial real estate lending group. From 2008 until 2013, Mr. Lublin served as Senior Vice President of Metropolitan Commercial Bank’s commercial real estate business. Mr. Lublin earned an MBA at Fordham University and a BS at SUNY Buffalo. Age 60.
|
|
| |
|
| |
Nick Rosenberg
|
|
| |
Executive Vice President and Chief Business Development Officer
|
| |||
| |
Nick Rosenberg has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Business Development Officer since June 2024. He previously served as Executive Vice President and Head of Global Payments from October 2018 to June 2024. Mr. Rosenberg joined the Company in 2001 and served as Executive Vice President and Chief Technology Officer from 2001 through October 2018. He is formally accredited as a Chartered Engineer and Member of the Institute of Engineering and Technology (UK) and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (USA). Mr. Rosenberg completed a postgraduate thesis in Development in Engineering and Technology and holds a BSc with Honors from the Open University (UK). Age 54.
|
|
| |
|
| |
We are asking stockholders to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers (the “NEOs”) (commonly referred to as a “Say-on-Pay” vote) as disclosed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (“CD&A”) section of this Proxy Statement, the related compensation disclosure tables, and the narrative discussion that accompanies the compensation disclosure tables. This is the Company’s fourth Say-on-Pay vote. The Board has determined that the Company will hold an advisory, non-binding, stockholder vote on the compensation of the Company’s NEOs on an annual basis until the next required vote on the frequency of future executive compensation votes (no later than the 2029 annual meeting of stockholders).
|
|
| |
|
| |
FOR THE REASONS INDICATED BELOW AND MORE FULLY DISCUSSED IN THE CD&A, THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT THE STOCKHOLDERS VOTE IN FAVOR OF THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY RESOLUTION:
|
|
| |
|
| |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
|
|
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | |
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | | ||
| | | | | |
| |
Element Covered During Outreach
|
| |
Our Response
|
|
| | Compensation Structure | | |||
| | 79% of CEO compensation dependent on achieving certain performance targets (‘at-risk’) | | |
•
No change. Additional discussion provided in this CD&A to disclose the Compensation Committee’s process for setting and determining the significant portion of at-risk compensation for our CEO.
|
|
| | Emphasis on risk management | | |
•
Retained, but with heightened emphasis on financial performance measures.
|
|
| | Annual Incentive Program | | |||
| | No metric overlap with PRSU awards | | |
•
Revised to remove overlap in 2026.
|
|
| | Focus on near-term, calculable metrics | | |
•
Revised for 2026 to net interest income growth, loan growth and earnings per share (“EPS”) growth.
|
|
| | Choice of metrics and alignment with annual budget and strategic plan | | |
•
Revised to explain and tie directly to budget for 2026.
|
|
| | PRSU Award Program | | |||
| | Lengthen performance period | | |
•
Extended to three years commencing with 2026 awards.
|
|
| | Tie metrics to long-term value creation and stockholder returns | | |
•
Revised for 2026 to absolute ROATCE and Tangible Book Value Per Share Growth, tied directly to strategic outlook and our three-year plan. Removed Safety & Soundness component.
|
|
| | Transparency and Disclosure | | |||
| | Enhance CD&A disclosure to explain Compensation Committee process and rationale behind incentive outcomes | | |
•
Revised to explain how metrics tie to strategy (page 50), the Compensation Committee’s process (page 46) and the Compensation Committee’s determinations (page 55).
|
|
| | Demonstrate the scope of stockholder outreach, including director participation | | |
•
Revised to enhance disclosure on our comprehensive outreach program and to discuss tangible efforts and broad reach.
|
|
| |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
|
| |
•
maintaining a competitive compensation program appropriate for attracting and retaining key personnel and motivating our executives to create value for our stockholders;
|
| | |
•
establishing a direct link between our strategic plan and business priorities and the objectives and incentive opportunities of our executives;
|
| | |
•
linking pay directly with performance by calibrating an appropriate level of ‘at-risk’ compensation; and
|
| | |
•
discouraging excessive risk-taking and balancing risk and reward, while taking into consideration stakeholder feedback as well as market trends and practices.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
MARK R. DEFAZIO
|
| |
SCOTT LUBLIN
|
| |
DANIEL DOUGHERTY
|
| |
LAURA CAPRA
|
| |
NICK ROSENBERG
|
|
| |
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
| |
EVP and Chief Lending Officer
|
| |
EVP and Chief Financial Officer
|
| |
EVP and Head of Retail Banking
|
| |
EVP and Chief Business Development Officer
|
|
| | |
CD&A OVERVIEW
|
| | | | |
| | | This CD&A describes our compensation philosophy and methodologies, and our current practices with respect to the remuneration programs for our NEOs. The remainder of the CD&A includes: | | |
See page
|
| |
| | | | | | | ||
| | | | | | | ||
| | | | | | | ||
| | | | | | | ||
| | | | | | |
| |
$71.1M
|
| | |
$6.8B
|
| | |
$7.4B
|
| | |
3.88%
|
|
| |
Net Income
|
| | |
Loans
|
| | |
Total Deposits
|
| | |
Net Interest Margin
|
|
| |
Key Strategic Initiatives
|
| |
Achievements
|
|
| |
Risk and Controls
|
| |
•
Strengthened our second line risk management functions with substantial investments, including new hires and technological capabilities across enterprise risk, third-party, operational and model risk.
•
Continued development of risk infrastructure, including policy governance, risk reporting and dashboards, compliance management systems, regulatory affairs and issues management process.
•
Drove efficiencies in risk reporting through robust management-level risk committee restructuring.
|
|
| |
Digital Transformation Initiative
|
| |
•
Meaningful progress on our Modern Banking in Motion program, including the successful migration off legacy ACH infrastructure, enhanced digital banking capabilities and implementation of origination and loan servicing applications.
•
Established artificial intelligence strategy and commenced integration of advanced capabilities and implementation of governance and risk management framework.
|
|
| |
Talent
|
| |
•
Stability in the executive leadership team in 2025. Senior management demonstrated its effective leadership and acute focus on client relationships.
•
Continued growth in headcount to support business expansion as well as our risk management, information technology and compliance functions.
•
Talent and leadership pipeline strengthened at all levels across the organization, with key senior hires in the areas of credit, compliance, artificial intelligence, enterprise risk management and information technology.
|
|
| |
Core Commercial Banking Activities
|
| |
•
Funded loan growth organically through core funding sources. Advanced strategic funding initiatives through existing and new deposit verticals.
•
Expanded presence in growth markets through branch expansion strategy, including full service branches in Lakewood, New Jersey and South Miami, Florida.
•
Maintained strong growth in key lending verticals. Developed robust pipeline of originations.
|
|
| |
Execution of Long-Term Strategy
|
| |
•
As shown in the chart below, the Company has achieved strong returns for our stockholders as compared to other middle-market New York-area banks and the broader regional bank benchmark since its initial public offering and has a track record of delivering robust growth in key measures of operating performance. Select long-term performance figures are identified below:
|
|
| |
HIGH PERFORMANCE
|
| | |
RISK MANAGEMENT
|
| | |
ACCOUNTABILITY
|
| | |
EXECUTION OF THE
COMPANY’S MISSION |
|
| |
Demonstrates a consistent commitment to excellence, achieving results that exceed expectations through focus, adaptability, and continuous improvement
|
| | |
Proactively identifies, assesses, and mitigates risk, and takes full ownership of the risk and control environment impacting their respective business areas
|
| | |
Takes ownership of decisions, actions, and outcomes — both personal and team-based — ensuring commitments are met and standards are upheld
|
| | |
Translates strategic objectives into actionable plans and measurable results that drive the organization’s success
|
|
| |
1
|
| |
Provide a Competitive Opportunity
|
| | Target compensation must be competitive, in particular relative to the New York City market, appropriate for retaining key personnel, and adequate for retaining and motivating executives to advance the Company’s mission and strategy. | |
| |
2
|
| |
Use Formulaic Scorecard with Challenging Targets Tied to a Rigorous Strategic Planning Process
|
| | Corporate and individual performance targets should be based on challenging short- and long-term objectives that are directly tied to the Company’s rigorous strategic planning efforts and that meaningfully advance the Company’s sustainable growth trajectory. Our executives’ performance should be evaluated using a formulaic scorecard based on these key financial and operating performance measures. | |
| |
3
|
| |
Pay for Performance Alignment
|
| | The CEO’s compensation mix should tie a majority of target compensation to our performance and be assessed against pre-set strategic, financial and operational measures that directly impact stockholder value creation. Accordingly, approximately 80% of our CEO’s total direct compensation is dependent on achieving certain performance targets (i.e., ‘at-risk’). | |
| |
4
|
| |
Emphasize Risk Balancing Features
|
| | Executive compensation plans should be tied, in part, to risk-conscious measures. This is intended to incentivize responsible decision-making and a long-term growth orientation while helping the Board set the ‘tone-from-the-top’ and establish a culture of integrity and ethical conduct. | |
| |
|
| |
WHAT WE DO
|
| | |
|
| |
WHAT WE AVOID
|
|
| |
•
Use an independent compensation consultant that is retained by and reports to the Compensation Committee
•
Tie a significant portion of executive compensation to individual and Company performance
•
Conduct an annual risk assessment of our compensation programs
•
Mitigate compensation risk by subjecting annual and long-term incentive plans to payment caps
•
Maintain a compensation clawback policy and use forfeiture provisions that give us the ability to recover and cancel incentive awards from our executive officers
•
Maintain a robust stock ownership requirement for executive officers
•
Engage in extensive outreach with our stockholders relating to the Company’s compensation program, practices and governance
|
| | |
•
Hedging of Company stock
•
Pledging of Company stock without Board approval
•
Encouraging excessive risk-taking through our compensation programs
•
Providing supplemental executive retirement plans
•
Offering excessive executive perquisites, including any deferred compensation plans
•
Using stock options, or repricing or buying-out previously issued stock options
•
Accruing dividends or dividend equivalents paid on unvested performance-based share unit awards
|
| ||||||
| |
Topic
|
| |
What We Heard
|
| |
Responsive Adjustments for 2026
|
|
| |
PRSU Award Performance Period
|
| | Earnout on long-term incentive awards (our PRSU program) is based on a 1-year performance period with awards vesting in equal installments over three years. Stockholders expressed a strong preference for long-term performance to be measured over a longer time period. | | |
•
Adopted a PRSU program with a 3-year, end-to-end performance period, commencing in 2026.
•
3-year performance period is more aligned with market practice and institutional stockholder preferences.
|
|
| |
Scorecard and PRSU Metric Overlap
|
| | CEO’s scorecard under the Amended and Restated Executive Annual Incentive Plan (the “AIP”) uses performance measures that lead to a perception of overlap with performance measures used to determine the earnout on LTI awards. In 2024, the CEO’s scorecard referenced absolute ROATCE and ‘Safety and Soundness’ and the LTI awards referenced relative ROATCE and ‘Safety and Soundness.’ Investors noted that AIP awards should incorporate calculable, near-term financial metrics and LTI awards should align with measures that are tied to long-term value creation and stockholder returns. | | |
Introduced distinct measures in each of the annual and long-term components of the program:
•
AIP — performance measures tie directly to the Company’s annual budget and quarterly targets; removed and replaced Safety & Soundness measure with specific financial risk metrics:
•
Corporate Performance — Net interest income growth, loan growth and EPS Growth
•
Individual Performance — Liquidity and Interest Rate Risk Management and Credit Portfolio Risk Metrics
•
PRSU — Removed and replaced Safety & Soundness with metrics tied to long-term stockholder value creation, measured over a three-year performance period:
•
ROATCE
•
Tangible Book Value Per Share (“TBV”) growth
|
|
| |
PRSU Metric Design
|
| | The ‘Safety and Soundness’ measure in the CEO’s PRSU awards is heavily weighted and gives the impression that compensation outcomes are not formulaic and subject to Compensation Committee discretion. Investors indicated that they expected transparency around the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of qualitative/operational measures, as well as the tangible results of management’s performance. Several investors also discussed replacing the Safety & Soundness measure with quantifiable credit and/or risk proxies (e.g., Net Charge-Offs or Non-Performing Assets). | | |
•
As highlighted above, the Compensation Committee determined to use 3-year average TBV growth and ROATCE as the performance measures for the CEO’s 2026 PRSU award, and removed the Safety and Soundness measure.
•
The 2026 PRSU awards are therefore based on performance metrics that more closely align with stockholder value creation based on a pre-established formula. The ROATCE measure is weighted 60% and the TBV growth measure is weighted 40%.
|
|
| | | | | TBV growth was most frequently cited by investors that expressed a preference for specific metrics. Stockholders expressed mixed views on the use of total shareholder return (“TSR”) in the long-term incentive program. Several investors advocated for meaningfully weighting relative TSR in the PRSU program (or at least referencing TSR as a modifier to the earnout at the end of the performance period), while other stockholders noted skepticism about TSR or otherwise preferred the use of fundamental drivers of value creation. | | | | |
| |
Topic
|
| |
What We Heard
|
| |
Responsive Adjustments for 2026
|
|
| |
Transparency and Disclosure
|
| |
There was a broad emphasis on ensuring that the Company provides robust and clear disclosure to stockholders in the CD&A.
Stockholder discussions and request for additional disclosure set the tone for the Company to address the scope of outreach, including director participation, as well as any forward-looking program changes for 2026.
|
| |
Enhanced disclosure in a number of key areas highlighted by stockholders, including:
•
How do metrics link to firm strategy? (pages 53)
•
What is the Compensation Committee’s process? (pages 46)
•
What is the Compensation Committee’s rationale for the choices and determinations regarding metrics, targets, weights and resulting payouts? (pages 50)
•
What did the Compensation Committee change for the 2026 program? (pages 61)
|
|
| |
Clawback Policy
|
| | The Company’s ‘clawback policy’ complies with applicable SEC rules and NYSE listing standards, which provides for the mandatory recoupment of erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation in the event of an accounting restatement. Many financial services companies have expanded policies that permit the Company to recoup incentive awards from executives for specific categories of wrongdoing. | | |
•
The Company adopted an expanded compensation clawback policy to include additional fraud/misconduct recoupment triggers. See discussion for the Company’s recoupment and forfeiture policies on page 66 below.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
APRIL/MAY
•
Proxy season outreach (outreach to top 25 holders representing over 65% of then-outstanding MCB common stock)
MAY
•
2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
| |
JUNE
•
Established ‘Investor Engagement Committee’ to explore voting results and strengthen MCB’s investor outreach program
•
Compensation Committee meeting to discuss results of ‘say-on-pay’ vote and consider investor feedback
JULY
•
Compensation Committee meetings to consider potential structural changes to MCB’s executive comp. program
•
CG&N Committee meeting to consider governance-related stockholder engagement topics
|
| |
SEPTEMBER
•
Commenced outreach to certain institutional investors
OCTOBER
•
Compensation Committee and CG&N Committee meetings to discuss stockholder engagement efforts
|
| |
NOVEMBER
•
Engagement sessions completed
DECEMBER
•
Began preparing draft CD&A for 2026 proxy statement, including description of MCB’s stockholder engagement efforts, investor feedback and potential changes
EARLY 2026
•
Compensation Committee meeting to discuss investor feedback and make executive compensation recommendations related to pay for 2025 performance and 2026 target compensation
•
CG&N Committee meeting to discuss investor feedback on corporate governance and review proxy statement disclosure on outreach efforts
|
| |
MARCH
•
Investor Day
•
File proxy statement and commence proxy season outreach
APRIL
•
2026 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
| |
1. ESTABLISH GOALS AND TARGETS
|
| | |
2. EVALUATE PERFORMANCE
|
| | |
3. DETERMINE COMPENSATION
OUTCOMES |
|
| |
•
Conduct market benchmarking and analysis
•
Confirm corporate performance measures based on the annual budgeting and strategic planning process
•
Set individual goals in alignment with business plans and corporate strategy
•
Determine participants for long-term incentive award grants
|
| | |
•
Compare Company and individual performance against pre-established goals
•
Evaluate performance based on financial results and individual performance reviews
|
| | |
•
Assess achievement levels against pre-established targets
•
Recommend total direct compensation
|
|
| | | | | |
Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL)
|
| | | | | |
Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM)
|
| | | | | | | Pathward Financial, Inc. (CASH) | |
| | | | | | Bank First Corporation (BFC) | | | | | | | Enterprise Bancorp, Inc. (EBTC) | | | | | | | | QCR Holdings, Inc. (QCRH) | |
| | | | | | Blue Foundry Bancorp (BLFY) | | | | | | | First Foundation Inc. (FFWM) | | | | | | | | The Bancorp, Inc. (TBBK) | |
| | | | | | Byline Bancorp, Inc. (BY) | | | | | | |
National Bank Holdings Corporation (NBHC)
|
| | | | | | | Univest Financial Corporation (UVSP) | |
| | | | | | ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB) | | | | | | | NB Bancorp, Inc. (NBBK) | | | | | | | | Veritex Holdings, Inc. (VBTX) | |
| | | | |
Element
|
| |
Type
|
| |
2025 Key Features
|
| ||||
| |
FIXED
COMPENSATION
|
| |
Base Salary
|
| |
Cash
|
| |
When setting base salaries, the Compensation Committee considers factors such as experience, responsibilities, job performance, and market compensation information.
In 2025, the Compensation Committee approved base salary increases for all NEOs except the CEO. The approved salary increase for Mr. Dougherty (comprising an annual merit increase plus a mid-year market adjustment) reflected the significant expansion of his role in driving the Company’s strategy and key transformational initiatives. The Compensation Committee approved salary increases for the other NEOs (except the CEO) in the range of 4% – 5%.
|
| ||||
| |
INCENTIVE COMPENSATION
|
| |
Annual Incentives —
Executive Scorecard |
| |
Cash and Equity
|
| |
The Compensation Committee develops an executive scorecard for each executive officer and certain key personnel pursuant to the AIP. A participant’s earnout is based on two components:
(i)
the Company’s achievement of pre-established financial results (i.e., the corporate component), and
(ii)
individual performance objectives tied to each participant’s specific role and responsibilities.
The performance metrics generally have threshold, target and maximum goals to further align pay with increased levels of performance. These incentive awards are paid out in a mix of cash and RSUs that vest in equal installments over three years.
|
| | |
Link to Performance
•
Outcomes are determined based on a comprehensive review of corporate and individual performance
•
Significant portion of incentive compensation is awarded in deferred equity awards, which helps reinforce alignment with stockholder interests
•
PRSU awards are intended to motivate and reward achievement of long-term financial goals that drive stockholder returns
•
100% of incentive compensation is subject to risk assessment, clawback and forfeiture
|
|
| |
Long-Term —
PRSU Awards |
| | Equity | | | The Compensation Committee determines PRSU grants for the NEOs based on a variety of factors, including each executive’s performance, previous grant history, comparison to our peer group, and retention needs. | | | ||||||
| |
Name
|
| |
Title
|
| |
2024 Base Salary
($) |
| |
2025 Base Salary
($) |
| |
Increase
Percentage |
| |||||||||
| | Mark R. DeFazio | | | President and Chief Executive Officer | | | |
|
1,000,000
|
| | | |
|
1,000,000
|
| | | |
|
—%
|
| |
| | Scott Lublin | | | EVP and Chief Lending Officer | | | |
|
510,994
|
| | | |
|
531,434
|
| | | |
|
4%
|
| |
| | Daniel Dougherty | | |
EVP and Chief Financial
Officer |
| | |
|
400,000
|
| | | |
|
500,000(1)
|
| | | |
|
25%
|
| |
| | Laura Capra | | | EVP and Head of Retail Banking | | | |
|
407,492
|
| | | |
|
427,867
|
| | | |
|
5%
|
| |
| | Nick Rosenberg | | | EVP and Chief Business Development Officer | | | |
|
433,591
|
| | | |
|
450,935
|
| | | |
|
4%
|
| |
| |
Measure
|
| |
Description/Rationale
|
| |
Target
|
| |
Target Setting Methodology
|
|
| | Annual Net Interest Income Growth (new for 2025) | | |
As a true commercial bank, net interest income growth is the primary driver of profitability for the Company. The measure is used to approximate management’s ability to effectively drive net interest margin, efficiently manage the Company’s balance sheet, and exercise pricing discipline on a quarter-over-quarter basis.
The Compensation Committee determined that the Net Interest Income Growth, together with the Adjusted ROATCE measure, provides it with a more direct proxy for corporate performance as compared to the Net Income Growth measure used in the prior year.
|
| |
10 – 12%
|
| |
The target is derived from the annual operating budget. The Compensation Committee believes that the resulting target is challenging yet reasonable given the range of market scenarios considered as part of the budget-making process. The outcome directly measures management’s execution against our core business activities and strategy.
Net Interest Income Growth is calculated on a generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) basis.
|
|
| | Adjusted ROATCE(1) | | |
ROATCE is intended to measure management’s ability to generate returns for common stockholders. The inclusion of this measure is meant to incentivize management to efficiently allocate capital in a manner that supports business growth and enhances the value of the Company for our stockholders.
Consistent with prior years, ROATCE is adjusted to account for certain items such as the Company’s digital transformation initiative, and other non-recurring compliance, legal and regulatory expenses.
|
| |
9 – 11%
|
| | The target is based on the Company’s operating budget and capital plan while taking into account potential capital actions such as quarterly dividends and share repurchases. The outcome directly reflects management’s execution against the Company’s plans for the year. | |
| |
Measure
|
| |
Description/Rationale
|
| |
Target Setting Methodology
|
|
| | Relative ROATCE Percentile Ranking | | |
As discussed, our ROATCE performance is considered an important proxy for management’s effectiveness in generating earnings for common stockholders.(1)
Notably, this measure is relative (contrary to the measure included in the corporate component of the executive scorecard), which helps align our CEO’s compensation directly to the Company’s performance and our stockholders’ returns during the performance period. For the 2025 PRSUs, the ranking is based on the ROATCE Benchmarking Peer Group, rather than the compensation benchmarking peer group outlined in the Peer Group section above (in 2024, the PRSUs earned out in part based on relative ROATCE ranking against the full compensation benchmarking peer group). Additional detail regarding ROATCE and the ROATCE Benchmarking Peer Group is provided below.
|
| |
50% of the PRSU award earnout is based on this performance measure.
The number of RSUs that can be earned at the end of the performance period is contingent on attaining a relative ROATCE percentile ranking as outlined below:
•
100% for 65th percentile or higher
•
75% for 60th to 65th percentile
•
50% for 55th to 60th percentile
•
0% for 55th percentile or below
The target is intended to set a meaningful benchmark for our CEO, and the earnout is contingent on outperformance (greater than 55th percentile) against a predetermined subset of our peers. Half of the CEO’s PRSU award earnout is contingent on outperforming a majority of peers.
|
|
| | Non-Financial Measures — Risk, Regulatory and Control | | | Enhancing and scaling the Company’s risk management framework is one of our main strategic pillars. The Compensation Committee believes it is important to embed risk management-related metrics into the CEO’s compensation plan to help ensure that we can execute our strategic initiatives with an appropriate level of risk. This measure also supports the Board with setting a ‘tone from the top’ more broadly and establishing a culture of integrity, ethical conduct and responsible decision-making throughout the Company. | | |
50% of the PRSU award earnout is based on the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the CEO’s achievement in enhancing and scaling the Company’s risk management framework and infrastructure, its control environment and the overall safety and soundness of the enterprise, in line with the Company’s strategic plan.
The metrics that the Compensation Committee identified for evaluating performance on this component of the award include, among others:
•
progress on regulatory enhancement program deliverables and the Company’s readiness to cross the $10 billion asset threshold
•
the Company’s capital and liquidity profile and corresponding Board and management risk indicators
•
commercial loan portfolio reports and credit risk metrics and internal and external audit reports and loan review reports
|
|
| | | | | |
Bankwell Financial Group Inc. (BWFG)
Brookline Bancorp, Inc. (BRKL)
ConnectOne Bancorp, Inc. (CNOB)
Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM)
Flushing Financial Corporation (FFIC)
|
| | | | | |
Israel Discount Bank of New York
OceanFirst Financial Corp. (OCFC)
Provident Financial Services, Inc. (PFS)
Valley National Bancorp (VLY)
|
|
| |
Measure
|
| |
Description/Rationale
|
| |
Target Setting Methodology
|
|
| | Corporate Performance (70%) | | ||||||
| | Net Loan Growth | | | Continuing to demonstrate strong loan growth and converting the Company’s strong pipeline into real originations is a central function of the Chief Lending Officer’s role and a core driver of the growth of our franchise. | | |
75% of the corporate component of the PRSU award is based on this performance measure.
The target attainment level for this performance measure is 12% net loan growth over the performance period. This target reflects a significant but attainable annual growth objective for the Company and is consistent with our operating plan’s forecast.
|
|
| | Net Increase in Lending Deposit Relationships | | | This measure is intended to capture the Chief Lending Officer’s contribution to both growing and deepening our relationships with our clients. The Board continues to value management’s ability to not only increase our loan portfolio but also deepen our relationships with clients by handling an increasingly larger share of their banking business. | | |
25% of the corporate component of the PRSU award is based on this performance measure.
The target attainment level for this performance measure is $100 million, with a 5% demand deposit account growth rate based on average deposit balances for 2025. This target incentivizes management to seek deposit relationships to fund our loan growth trajectory in a manner that is cost effective and supportive of the Company’s net interest margin and earnings growth targets.
|
|
| | Individual Performance (30%) | | ||||||
| | Net Charge Offs | | | Credit risk is a significant risk exposure for the Company. This measure is intended to capture credit risk management in the Chief Lending Officer’s incentive structure and incentivize responsible lending and portfolio management practices. This measure further supports the Board’s efforts to integrate risk management as a fundamental practice of the Company. | | |
67% of the individual performance component of the PRSU award is based on this performance measure.
The target attainment level for this performance measure is set at less than 25 basis points of net charge offs in the year, which is a level that matches the Company’s risk tolerance and historical experience.
|
|
| |
Measure
|
| |
Description/Rationale
|
| |
Target Setting Methodology
|
|
| |
Material Loan Exceptions
|
| | As another proxy for credit risk and portfolio management, the Compensation Committee determined to include a measure designed to capture the Company’s exposure to potential credit events by monitoring the rate of loan exceptions in the performance period. As the number of exceptions to original loan terms increases, the overall risk of the commercial loan portfolio increases as well. | | |
33% of the individual performance component of the PRSU award is based on this performance measure.
The target attainment level for this performance measure is set at 0% net increase in material loan exceptions. This threshold is based on the Company’s risk appetite and historical experience.
|
|
| |
Name
|
| |
Annual
Base Salary ($) |
| |
Target Annual
Incentive ($) |
| |
Target
PRSU Awards ($) |
| |
Target
Total Direct Compensation ($) |
| ||||||||||||
| |
Mark R. DeFazio
President and CEO |
| | |
|
1,000,000
|
| | | |
|
1,500,000(1)
|
| | | |
|
2,000,000(2)
|
| | | |
|
4,500,000
|
| |
| |
Scott Lublin
EVP and Chief Lending Officer |
| | |
|
531,434
|
| | | |
|
531,434(3)
|
| | | |
|
1,000,000(1)
|
| | | |
|
2,062,868
|
| |
| |
Daniel Dougherty
EVP and CFO |
| | |
|
500,000
|
| | | |
|
500,000(3)
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
1,000,000
|
| |
| |
Laura Capra
EVP and Head of Retail Banking |
| | |
|
427,866
|
| | | |
|
427,866(3)
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
855,732
|
| |
| |
Nick Rosenberg
EVP and Chief Business Development Officer |
| | |
|
450,935
|
| | | |
|
450,935(3)
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
901,870
|
| |
| |
Corporate Performance Measure
|
| |
Target
|
| |
2025
Outcome |
| |
Performance
Achievement Level |
| |||
| | Annual Net Interest Income Growth | | |
10% – 12%
|
| | |
|
19.8%
|
| | |
Exceeds
|
|
| | Adjusted ROATCE(1) | | |
9% – 11%
|
| | |
|
10.5%
|
| | |
Meets
|
|
| |
AIP Performance Measures
|
| |
Target
($) |
| |
Outcome
|
| |
Incentive
Payout ($) |
| ||||||
| | Corporate Performance (80%) | | | |
|
1,200,000
|
| | |
Exceeds
|
| | |
|
1,500,000
|
| |
| | Non-Financial – Risk, Regulatory and Control (20%) | | | |
|
300,000
|
| | |
Meets
|
| | |
|
300,000
|
| |
| | Total(1) | | | |
|
1,500,000
|
| | | | | | |
|
1,800,000(2)
|
| |
| |
2025 PRSU Award
|
| |
Target Value
(# of Restricted Stock Units) |
| |
Outcome
|
| |
Earnout
(# of Restricted Stock Units) |
| ||||||
| | Adjusted ROATCE(1) Performance (50%) | | | |
|
17,603
|
| | |
Meets
|
| | |
|
17,603
|
| |
| | Non-Financial – Risk, Regulatory and Control (50%) | | | |
|
17,602
|
| | |
Meets
|
| | |
|
17,602
|
| |
| | Total(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
35,205(2)
|
| |
| |
AIP Performance Measures
|
| |
Target
($) |
| |
Outcome
|
| |
Incentive
Payout ($) |
| ||||||
| | Corporate Performance (50%) | | | |
|
265,717
|
| | |
Exceeds
|
| | |
|
332,146
|
| |
| | Individual Performance (50%) | | | |
|
265,717
|
| | |
Exceeds
|
| | |
|
318,861
|
| |
| | Total(2) | | | |
|
531,434
|
| | | | | | |
|
651,007(1)
|
| |
| |
2025 PRSU Award
|
| |
Target Value
(# of Restricted Stock Units) |
| |
Outcome
|
| |
Earnout
(# of Restricted Stock Units) |
| ||||||
| | Corporate Performance (70%) | | | |
|
12,321
|
| | |
Meets
|
| | |
|
12,321
|
| |
| | Individual Performance (30%) | | | |
|
5,281
|
| | |
Meets
|
| | |
|
5,281
|
| |
| | Total(2) | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
17,602(1)
|
| |
| |
Strategic Pillar
|
| |
Performance Goal
|
| |
2025 Accomplishments
|
|
| |
Disciplined and Diversified High Performance Commercial Bank
|
| |
Net Loan Growth
|
| |
•
Net loan growth of 12.9% year-over-year
|
|
| | Net Increase in Lending Deposit Relationships with Demand Deposit Account Growth based on 2025 Average Balances | | |
•
Average balance increase of $155 million in Lending Deposit Relationships
•
Demand deposit growth of 9% or $50 million
|
| |||
| | Net Charge Offs | | |
•
Net charge offs of 6 bps or $3.7 million in 2025 (compared to 0 bps or $0.1 million in 2024)
|
| |||
| | Business development | | |
•
Maintained existing relationships as well as expanded client base
|
| |||
| |
Enhanced Risk Management Frameworks
|
| |
Enhance the Credit review and governance framework, including Credit Committee processes
|
| |
•
Established a process to review all credits before loan committee to ensure high quality credit requests are presented for approval
|
|
| | Community Reinvestment Act performance | | |
•
Led the Company’s efforts to become a U.S. Small Business Administration lender
•
Community Reinvestment Act rating of Satisfactory. Recognized leadership in community development lending
|
|
| |
AIP Performance Measures
|
| |
Target
($) |
| |
Outcome
|
| |
Incentive
Payout ($) |
| ||||||
| | Corporate Performance (50%) | | | |
|
250,000
|
| | |
Exceeds
|
| | |
|
312,500
|
| |
| | Individual Performance (50%) | | | |
|
250,000
|
| | |
Exceeds
|
| | |
|
343,750
|
| |
| | Total(2) | | | |
|
500,000
|
| | | | | | |
|
656,250(1)
|
| |
| |
Strategic Pillar
|
| |
Performance Goal
|
| |
2025 Accomplishments
|
|
| |
Disciplined and Diversified High Performance Commercial Bank
|
| |
Deposit and Loan Pricing Discipline
|
| |
•
Net interest margin of 3.88% for the year
|
|
| | Strategic and Capital Planning Process | | |
•
Continued execution of asset/liability management strategy to effectively manage liquidity, interest rate and market risk
|
| |||
| | Investor Relations and Stakeholder Engagement | | |
•
Cultivated investor engagement through Earnings Calls and one-on-one follow ups as well as development of Investor Deck
|
| |||
| | Enhanced Risk Management Frameworks | | | Enhance Finance and accounting processes | | |
•
Drove process and program development of Finance functions, including Allowance for Credit Losses process, and Asset Liability Committee reporting on interest rate risk and liquidity
|
|
| |
AIP Performance Measures
|
| |
Target
($) |
| |
Outcome
|
| |
Incentive
Payout ($) |
| ||||||
| | Corporate Performance (50%) | | | |
|
213,933
|
| | |
Exceeds
|
| | |
|
267,417
|
| |
| | Individual Performance (50%) | | | |
|
213,933
|
| | |
Exceeds
|
| | |
|
288,810
|
| |
| | Total(2) | | | |
|
427,866
|
| | | | | | |
|
556,227(1)
|
| |
| |
Strategic Pillar
|
| |
Performance Goal
|
| |
2025 Accomplishments
|
|
| |
Disciplined and Diversified High Performance Commercial Bank
|
| |
Total Net Deposit Growth
|
| |
•
Total Net Deposit Growth of $1.26 billion, 125% year-over-year increase
|
|
| | Customer success and satisfaction | | |
•
Strong service level resulted in expansion, acquisition and referrals of client relationships
|
| |||
| | Business development, including driving Lending Deposit Relationships | | |
•
Success in developing deposit relationships with lending clients
•
Execution on branch expansion strategy, including opening of full service branch location in New Jersey.
|
| |||
| | Enhanced Risk Management Frameworks | | | Enhance Retail Business’s Risk, Regulatory and Control Environment | | |
•
Demonstrated focus on reviewing and developing plans to mitigate risks throughout the Retail network
|
|
| | Digital Transformation | | | Title and Escrow vertical technology integration | | |
•
Successful completion of vendor integrations for deposit vertical
|
|
| |
AIP Performance Measures
|
| |
Target
($) |
| |
Outcome
|
| |
Incentive
Payout ($) |
| ||||||
| | Corporate Performance (50%) | | | |
|
225,468
|
| | |
Exceeds
|
| | |
|
281,834
|
| |
| | Individual Performance (50%) | | | |
|
225,468
|
| | |
Meets
|
| | |
|
225,468
|
| |
| | Total(2) | | | |
|
450,936
|
| | | | | | |
|
507,302(1)
|
| |
| |
Strategic Pillar
|
| |
Performance Goal
|
| |
2025 Accomplishments
|
|
| |
Disciplined and Diversified High Performance Commercial Bank
|
| |
Business development, including client conversions in key strategic industries
|
| |
•
Established several new high potential client relationships
|
|
| | Drive net interest income and low cost deposit opportunities. | | |
•
Realized impact on income and deposit through new client relationships
|
| |||
| | Enhanced Risk Management Frameworks | | | Develop the Company’s merchant acquiring line of business | | |
•
Additional onboarding of business development staff
•
Developed enhanced process for second line oversight through Financial Crimes Compliance and Enterprise Risk Management functions
|
|
| |
Name
|
| |
Annual Base
Salary ($) |
| |
Annual
Incentive Payout ($) |
| |
PRSU Award Payout
|
| |
Total Direct
Compensation ($) |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| |
(Outcome)
|
| |
($)(3)
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Mark R. DeFazio
President and CEO |
| | |
|
1,000,000
|
| | | |
|
1,800,000(1)
|
| | | |
|
Target
|
| | | |
|
2,000,000
|
| | | |
|
4,800,000
|
| |
| |
Scott Lublin
EVP and Chief Lending Officer |
| | |
|
531,434
|
| | | |
|
651,007(2)
|
| | | |
|
Target
|
| | | |
|
1,000,000
|
| | | |
|
2,182,441
|
| |
| |
Daniel Dougherty
EVP and CFO |
| | |
|
500,000
|
| | | |
|
656,250(2)
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
1,156,250
|
| |
| |
Name
|
| |
Annual Base
Salary ($) |
| |
Annual
Incentive Payout ($) |
| |
PRSU Award Payout
|
| |
Total Direct
Compensation ($) |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| |
(Outcome)
|
| |
($)(3)
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Laura Capra
EVP and Head of Retail Banking |
| | |
|
427,866
|
| | | |
|
556,227(2)
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
984,093
|
| |
| |
Nick Rosenberg
EVP and Chief Business Development Officer |
| | |
|
450,936
|
| | | |
|
507,302(2)
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
958,237
|
| |
| |
Measure
|
| |
Description/Rationale
|
|
| | Net Interest Income Growth (12.5%) | | |
•
As a true commercial bank, net interest income growth is the primary driver of profitability for the Company. The measure approximates management’s ability to effectively drive net interest margin, efficiently manage the Company’s balance sheet, and exercise loan and deposit pricing discipline on a quarter-over-quarter basis. The outcome directly measures management’s execution against our core business activities and strategy.
•
Net Interest Income Growth is calculated on a GAAP basis.
|
|
| |
Loan Growth (12.5%)
(New for 2026) |
| |
•
Continuing to demonstrate strong loan growth and converting the Company’s strong pipeline into originations is a primary measure by which the Company’s short-term performance is measured.
•
This measure is established based on the Company’s annual operating plan and budget, as approved by the Board in early 2026.
|
|
| |
Measure
|
| |
Description/Rationale
|
|
| |
EPS Growth (25%)
(New for 2026) |
| |
•
The Company’s EPS growth is a key short-term measure that reflects management’s operational execution, including with respect to its expense base and ability to generate capital. As a key driver of stock price valuation and movement, the measure further aligns management’s short-term business and operational performance with the stockholder experience.
•
The EPS Growth figure is adjusted for certain customary matters, including capital actions, mergers or acquisitions.
|
|
| |
Liquidity and Interest Rate Risk Management and Credit Portfolio Risk Metrics (50%)
(New for 2026) |
| |
•
Reflects management’s execution of the Company’s capital plan and asset-liability strategy, as well as the ability of management to operate within the Board-approved risk appetite and corresponding financial and credit risk limits. A strong liquidity position and disciplined asset-liability management are critical to protecting the Company from earnings volatility, capital depletion and regulatory, customer and public scrutiny.
•
The Compensation Committee will evaluate several relevant risk metrics and performance indicators to determine the CEO’s performance outcome at the end of the performance period, and has determined not to place weightings on the indicators that are evaluated.
|
|
| |
Measure
|
| |
Description/Rationale
|
|
| | Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (60%) | | |
•
As discussed, our ROATCE performance is an important measurement of management’s effectiveness in generating earnings for common stockholders. The inclusion of this measure is intended to incentivize management to efficiently allocate capital in a manner that supports business growth and enhances the value of the Company for our stockholders.
•
The 2025 PRSU awards include ROATCE on a relative basis. The Compensation Committee determined that the absolute ROATCE figure is a preferrable measure of performance over a long-term performance period as it mitigates the potential for idiosyncratic or company specific outcomes in the peer group (e.g., mergers and acquisitions, capital actions, etc.) having an outsized influence or skewing the results over the performance cycle. Moreover, using an absolute figure simplifies the long-term incentive program and eliminates the inherent challenges in establishing a fair and comparable peer group.
•
The ROATCE target ties directly to the Company’s strategic outlook and three-year plan as approved by the Board in January 2026.
|
|
| | Tangible Book Value Per Share Growth (40%) | | |
•
Many stockholders confirmed the importance of TBV growth as a measure for evaluating a financial institution’s performance over the long-term. This measure captures management’s ability to compound real equity over time, and sustained TBV growth requires strong core earnings, prudent balance sheet management and appropriate capital deployment. The measure therefore provides a holistic way to assess management’s effectiveness and the Company’s ability to create value for stockholders over the long-term.
•
The Compensation Committee established the TBV Growth target based on the Company’s strategic outlook and three-year plan, including anticipated capital actions over the performance period, as well as historical TBV performance.
|
|
| |
Clawback/Forfeiture Trigger
|
| |
Clawback/Forfeiture Provision
|
|
| |
Clawback Policy
Incentive-based compensation received during the three prior fiscal years is subject to recovery in the event (i) of an accounting restatement or (ii) an executive is determined to have engaged in certain forms of corporate misconduct (e.g., breach of fiduciary duty, causing significant harm to the Company’s reputation, etc.)
|
| |
•
Restatement: The Company must claw back awarded incentive-based compensation in excess of the amount the executive would have received had the award been determined on the restated financial measure(s)
•
Misconduct: The Company may claw back all or a portion of the executive’s incentive-based compensation. The Compensation Committee may determine that any unpaid or unvested incentive-based compensation is forfeited in connection with the misconduct.
|
|
| |
Equity Plan
Equity awards are subject to forfeiture in the event an employee is terminated for cause (e.g., personal dishonesty, breaches of the Company’s Code of Ethics, etc.) or, subject to certain exceptions (e.g., disability, retirement, etc.), if the employee leaves the Company for any reason.
|
| |
•
RSUs: All unvested RSUs are deemed expired and forfeited.
•
PRSUs: All unvested PRSUs are deemed expired and forfeited.
|
|
| |
Employment Agreements
Executives terminated for cause (e.g., self-dealing, fraud, etc.) forfeit their rights to equity awards they would have been entitled to if they had been terminated for another reason (except as otherwise required by law).
|
| |
•
Following a termination for cause, an executive does not have the right to receive any compensation or benefits for any period after the date of their termination, including compensation or benefits that they would otherwise have been entitled to receive after a termination under another provision of their employment agreement.
|
|
| |
Compensation Committee of the Board
|
| ||||||||||||
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
GEORGE J. WOLF, JR.
(Chair) |
| |
ANTHONY FABIANO
|
| |
DAVID J. GOLD
|
| |
HARVEY M. GUTMAN
|
| |
ROBERT C. PATENT
|
|
| |
Name and principal position
|
| |
Year
|
| |
Salary
($) |
| |
Stock Awards
($)(1) |
| |
Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Compensation ($) |
| |
All Other
Compensation ($)(2) |
| |
Total
($) |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| |
Mark R. DeFazio
President and CEO |
| | |
|
2025
|
| | | |
|
1,000,000
|
| | | |
|
2,549,972
|
| | | |
|
1,200,000
|
| | | |
|
34,713
|
| | | |
|
4,784,685
|
| |
| | |
|
2024
|
| | | |
|
1,000,000
|
| | | |
|
3,499,968
|
| | | |
|
1,100,000
|
| | | |
|
34,024
|
| | | |
|
5,633,992
|
| | |||
| | |
|
2023
|
| | | |
|
980,000
|
| | | |
|
1,500,000
|
| | | |
|
500,000
|
| | | |
|
26,460
|
| | | |
|
3,006,460
|
| | |||
| |
Scott Lublin
EVP and Chief Lending Officer |
| | |
|
2025
|
| | | |
|
531,434
|
| | | |
|
1,383,201
|
| | | |
|
162,752
|
| | | |
|
19,252
|
| | | |
|
2,096,639
|
| |
| | |
|
2024
|
| | | |
|
510,994
|
| | | |
|
1,460,614
|
| | | |
|
127,749
|
| | | |
|
17,866
|
| | | |
|
2,117,223
|
| | |||
| | |
|
2023
|
| | | |
|
491,341
|
| | | |
|
531,498
|
| | | |
|
153,544
|
| | | |
|
11,460
|
| | | |
|
1,187,843
|
| | |||
| |
Daniel Dougherty
EVP and Chief Financial Officer |
| | |
|
2025
|
| | | |
|
500,000
|
| | | |
|
356,236
|
| | | |
|
164,062
|
| | | |
|
18,298
|
| | | |
|
1,038,596
|
| |
| | |
|
2024
|
| | | |
|
400,000
|
| | | |
|
225,000
|
| | | |
|
118,750
|
| | | |
|
17,224
|
| | | |
|
760,974
|
| | |||
| | |
|
2023
|
| | | |
|
400,000
|
| | | |
|
100,000
|
| | | |
|
75,000
|
| | | |
|
11,460
|
| | | |
|
586,460
|
| | |||
| |
Laura Capra
EVP and Head of Retail Banking |
| | |
|
2025
|
| | | |
|
427,867
|
| | | |
|
317,023
|
| | | |
|
139,057
|
| | | |
|
18,116
|
| | | |
|
902,063
|
| |
| | |
|
2024
|
| | | |
|
407,492
|
| | | |
|
349,279
|
| | | |
|
105,693
|
| | | |
|
17,713
|
| | | |
|
880,177
|
| | |||
| | |
|
2023
|
| | | |
|
388,088
|
| | | |
|
370,829
|
| | | |
|
116,426
|
| | | |
|
11,460
|
| | | |
|
886,803
|
| | |||
| |
Nick Rosenberg
EVP and Head of Global Payments |
| | |
|
2025
|
| | | |
|
450,935
|
| | | |
|
325,193
|
| | | |
|
126,826
|
| | | |
|
16,463
|
| | | |
|
919,417
|
| |
| | |
|
2024
|
| | | |
|
433,591
|
| | | |
|
320,504
|
| | | |
|
108,398
|
| | | |
|
15,979
|
| | | |
|
878,472
|
| | |||
| | |
|
2023
|
| | | |
|
416,915
|
| | | |
|
409,831
|
| | | |
|
106,835
|
| | | |
|
11,460
|
| | | |
|
945,041
|
| | |||
| |
Name
|
| |
Life Insurance
Premiums ($) |
| |
Transportation
($) |
| |
401(k) Employer
Contribution ($) |
| |
Executive
Supplemental Life and Disability Insurance Premiums ($) |
| |
Total
($) |
| |||||||||||||||
| | Mark R. DeFazio | | | |
$
|
720
|
| | | |
$
|
17,476
|
| | | |
$
|
10,500
|
| | | |
$
|
6,017
|
| | | |
$
|
34,713
|
| |
| | Scott Lublin | | | |
$
|
720
|
| | | |
$
|
780
|
| | | |
$
|
10,500
|
| | | |
$
|
5,956
|
| | | |
$
|
17,956
|
| |
| | Daniel Dougherty | | | |
$
|
720
|
| | | |
$
|
780
|
| | | |
$
|
10,500
|
| | | |
$
|
5,314
|
| | | |
$
|
17,314
|
| |
| | Laura Capra | | | |
$
|
720
|
| | | |
$
|
780
|
| | | |
$
|
10,500
|
| | | |
$
|
5,803
|
| | | |
$
|
17,803
|
| |
| | Nick Rosenberg | | | |
$
|
720
|
| | | |
$
|
780
|
| | | |
$
|
10,500
|
| | | |
$
|
4,069
|
| | | |
$
|
16,069
|
| |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) |
| |
Estimated Future Payouts Under
Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) |
| |
All Other
Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units (#) |
| |
Grant Date
Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(3) ($) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Name
|
| |
Grant
Type |
| |
Grant
Date |
| |
Threshold
($) |
| |
Target
($) |
| |
Maximum
($) |
| |
Threshold
($) |
| |
Target
(#) |
| |
Maximum
(#) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Mark R. DeFazio
|
| |
PRSU
|
| | |
|
3/26/2025
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
35,205
|
| | | |
|
1,999,996
|
| |
| | RSU | | | |
|
3/1/2025
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
9,453
|
| | | |
|
549,976
|
| | |||
| | AIP | | | | | | | | | |
|
750,000
|
| | | |
|
1,500,000
|
| | | |
|
2,250,000
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| |
Scott Lublin
|
| |
PRSU
|
| | |
|
3/26/2025
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
17,602
|
| | | |
|
999,970
|
| |
| | RSU | | | |
|
3/1/2025
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
6,587
|
| | | |
|
383,232
|
| | |||
| | AIP | | | | | | | | | |
|
252,431
|
| | | |
|
531,434
|
| | | |
|
783,866
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| |
Daniel Dougherty
|
| |
RSU
|
| | |
|
3/1/2025
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
6,123
|
| | | |
|
356,236
|
| |
| | AIP | | | | | | | | | |
|
250,000
|
| | | |
|
500,000
|
| | | |
|
750,000
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| |
Laura Capra
|
| |
RSU
|
| | |
|
3/1/2025
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
5,449
|
| | | |
|
317,023
|
| |
| | AIP | | | | | | | | | |
|
192,540
|
| | | |
|
427,866
|
| | | |
|
620,407
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| |
Nick Rosenberg
|
| |
RSU
|
| | |
|
3/1/2025
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
5,589
|
| | | |
|
325,168
|
| |
| | AIP | | | | | | | | | |
|
225,468
|
| | | |
|
450,935
|
| | | |
|
676,403
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| | | | |
Option Awards
|
| |
Stock Awards
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | |
Option
Award Grant Date |
| |
Number of
securities underlying unexercised options exercisable |
| |
Number of
securities underlying unexercised options unexercisable |
| |
Option
exercise price ($) |
| |
Option
expiration date |
| |
Stock
Award Grant Date |
| |
Number
of shares or units of stock that have not vested |
| |
Fair value
of shares or units of stock that have not vested(1) ($) |
| |
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Number of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested |
| |
Equity
Incentive Plan Awards: Market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested(1) ($) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
Mark R. DeFazio
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/26/2025
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
35,205(2)
|
| | | |
|
2,688,254
|
| |
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2025
|
| | |
|
9,453(6)
|
| | | |
|
721,831
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
5/30/2024
|
| | |
|
16,280(5)
|
| | | |
|
1,243,141
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2024
|
| | |
|
8,104(4)
|
| | | |
|
618,821
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2023
|
| | |
|
2,977(3)
|
| | | |
|
227,324
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| |
Scott Lublin
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/26/2025
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
17,602(2)
|
| | | |
|
1,344,089
|
| |
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2025
|
| | |
|
6,587(6)
|
| | | |
|
502,983
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
5/30/2024
|
| | |
|
4,884(5)
|
| | | |
|
372,942
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2024
|
| | |
|
7,466(4)
|
| | | |
|
570,104
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2023
|
| | |
|
3,164(3)
|
| | | |
|
241,603
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| |
Daniel Dougherty
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2025
|
| | |
|
6,123(6)
|
| | | |
|
467,552
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| |
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2024
|
| | |
|
3,646(4)
|
| | | |
|
278,409
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2023
|
| | |
|
595(3)
|
| | | |
|
45,434
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| |
Laura Capra
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2025
|
| | |
|
5,449(6)
|
| | | |
|
416,086
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| |
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2024
|
| | |
|
5,661(5)
|
| | | |
|
432,274
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2023
|
| | |
|
2,208(3)
|
| | | |
|
168,603
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| |
Nick Rosenberg
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2025
|
| | |
|
5,589(6)
|
| | | |
|
426,776
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| |
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2024
|
| | |
|
5,194(4)
|
| | | |
|
396,614
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |
3/1/2023
|
| | |
|
2,440(3)
|
| | | |
|
186,318
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | |||
| | | | |
Options Exercises and Stock Vested
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | |
Option Awards
|
| |
Stock Awards
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| |
Name
|
| |
Number of Shares
Acquired on Exercise (#) |
| |
Value Realized
on Exercise ($) |
| |
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting(1) (#) |
| |
Value Realized
on Vesting ($) |
| ||||||||||||
| | Mark R. DeFazio | | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
41,121
|
| | | |
|
2,519,456
|
| |
| | Scott Lublin | | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
10,733
|
| | | |
|
658,949
|
| |
| | Daniel Dougherty | | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
2,419
|
| | | |
|
146,180
|
| |
| | Laura Capra | | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
6,244
|
| | | |
|
377,325
|
| |
| | Nick Rosenberg | | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
6,473
|
| | | |
|
391,163
|
| |
| |
Plan Category
|
| |
Number of Securities
To be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Restricted Stock Units |
| |
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of Outstanding Options and Restricted Stock Units |
| |
Number of Securities
Remaining Available For Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans(1) |
| |||||||||
| |
Equity Compensation Plans
Approved By Security Holders |
| | |
|
261,475
|
| | | |
$
|
55.27
|
| | | |
|
901,282
|
| |
| | Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved By Security Holders | | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| |
| | Total | | | |
|
261,475
|
| | | |
$
|
55.27
|
| | | |
|
901,282
|
| |
| |
Name
|
| |
Compensation Element
|
| |
Termination for
Cause(1) ($) |
| |
Termination
Without Cause or for Good Reason(2)(7) ($) |
| |
Payments Due
Upon Change in Control(3)(7) ($) |
| |
Disability(4)
($) |
| |
Death(5)
($) |
| |||||||||||||||
| |
Mark R. DeFazio
|
| |
Cash Severance
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
4,200,000
|
| | | |
|
4,200,000
|
| | | |
|
4,200,000
|
| | | |
|
4,200,000
|
| |
| |
Restricted Stock Vesting(6)
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
5,499,371
|
| | | |
|
5,499,371
|
| | | |
|
5,499,371
|
| | | |
|
5,499,371
|
| | |||
| |
Scott Lublin
|
| |
Cash Severance
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
1,190,617
|
| | | |
|
1,190,617
|
| | | |
|
531,434
|
| | | |
|
531,434
|
| |
| |
Restricted Stock Vesting(6)
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
3,031,721
|
| | | |
|
3,031,721
|
| | | |
|
3,031,721
|
| | | |
|
3,031,721
|
| | |||
| |
Daniel Dougherty
|
| |
Cash Severance
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
500,000
|
| | | |
|
500,000
|
| | | |
|
500,000
|
| | | |
|
500,000
|
| |
| |
Restricted Stock Vesting(6)
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
791,395
|
| | | |
|
791,395
|
| | | |
|
791,395
|
| | | |
|
791,395
|
| | |||
| |
Laura Capra
|
| |
Cash Severance
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
427,492
|
| | | |
|
427,492
|
| | | |
|
427,492
|
| | | |
|
427,492
|
| |
| |
Restricted Stock Vesting(6)
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
1,016,962
|
| | | |
|
1,016,962
|
| | | |
|
1,016,962
|
| | | |
|
1,016,962
|
| | |||
| |
Nick Rosenberg
|
| |
Cash Severance
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
1,038,481
|
| | | |
|
1,038,481
|
| | | |
|
1,038,481
|
| | | |
|
1,038,481
|
| |
| |
Restricted Stock Vesting(6)
|
| | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
1,006,272
|
| | | |
|
1,006,272
|
| | | |
|
1,006,272
|
| | | |
|
1,006,272
|
| | |||
| | (a) | | | (b) | | | (c) | | | (d) | | | (e) | | | (f) | | | (g) | | | (h) | | | (i) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-PEO NEOs ($) | | | Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-PEO NEOs(2)(3) ($) | | | Value of Fixed $100 Investment Based on:(4) | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||
| | Year(1) | | | Summary Compensation Table for PEO ($) | | | Compensation Actually Paid to PEO(2)(3) ($) | | | Total Shareholder Return ($) | | | Peer Group Total Shareholder Return(5) ($) | | | Net Income ($ in millions) | | | Non-GAAP ROATCE (%) | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | 2025 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2024 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2023 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2022 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2021 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | PEO Adjustments | | | 2025 ($) | | | 2024 ($) | | | 2023 ($) | | | 2022 ($) | | | 2021 ($) | | |||||||||||||||
| | Summary Compensation Table Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Deduct): Fair Value of Equity Awards Included in Summary Compensation Table | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | |
| | Add: Fair Value of awards Granted in Current Year and Outstanding and Unvested at Year-End | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Add (Deduct): Change in Fair Value of Awards Granted in Prior Years and Outstanding and Unvested at Year-End | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | | | | | | | |
| | Add: Fair Value of Awards Granted and Vested in Current Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Add (Deduct): Change in Fair Value of awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested during Year | | | | | | | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | | | | | | | |
| | Add: Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years Forfeited in the Covered Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total CAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Non-PEO NEO Adjustments | | | 2025 ($) | | | 2024 ($) | | | 2023 ($) | | | 2022 ($) | | | 2021 ($) | | |||||||||||||||
| | Summary Compensation Table Total | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | (Deduct): Fair Value of Equity Awards Included in Summary Compensation Table | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | |
| | Add: Fair Value of awards Granted in Current Year and Outstanding and Unvested at Year-End | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Add (Deduct): Change in Fair Value of Awards Granted in Prior Years and Outstanding and Unvested at Year-End | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | | | | | | | |
| | Add: Fair Value of Awards Granted and Vested in Current Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Add (Deduct): Change in Fair Value of awards Granted in Prior Years that Vested during Year | | | | | | | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | | | | | ( | | | | | | | | |
| | Add: Fair Value of Equity Awards Granted in Prior Years Forfeited in the Covered Year | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Total CAP | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Financial Performance Measures | |
| | • | |
| | • | |
| | • | |
| |
|
| |
The Company’s Audit Committee has approved the engagement of Crowe LLP to be its independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2026, subject to the ratification of the engagement by the Company’s stockholders. We are asking stockholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s engagement of Crowe LLP for the year ending December 31, 2026.
|
|
| |
|
| |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF CROWE LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2026.
|
|
| |
Crowe LLP Fees
|
| |
2025
($) |
| |
2024
($) |
| ||||||
| | Audit Fees(1) | | | |
|
682,500
|
| | | |
|
592,592
|
| |
| | Audit-Related Fees(2) | | | |
|
28,350
|
| | | |
|
186,611
|
| |
| | Tax Fees | | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| |
| | All Other Fees | | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| |
| |
This report has been provided by
The Audit Committee |
| |||||||||||||||
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
| |
ANTHONY J. FABIANO
(Chair) |
| |
DALE C. FREDSTON
|
| |
TERENCE J. MITCHELL
|
| |
CHAYA PAMULA
|
| |
MARIA FIORINI RAMIREZ
|
| |
KATRINA ROBINSON
|
|
| |
|
| |
On March 18, 2026, the Board approved the ESPP, subject to approval of our stockholders. We are asking our stockholders to approve the ESPP to provide employees of the Company and the Bank the opportunity to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock as an additional employment benefit for our workforce.
|
|
| |
|
| |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE ESPP.
|
|
| |
|
| |
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE ESPP.
|
|
| |
Name of Beneficial Owners
|
| |
Amount of Shares Owned and
Nature of Beneficial Ownership(1) (#) |
| |
Percent of Shares of
Common Stock Outstanding |
| ||||||
| | • Five Percent Stockholders | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| |
BlackRock, Inc.
50 Hudson Yards New York, New York 10001 |
| | |
|
848,403(2)
|
| | | |
|
6.90%
|
| |
| |
Patriot Financial Partners III, L.P.
100 Matsonford Road, Suite 210 Randor, Pennsylvania 19087 |
| | |
|
668,684(3)
|
| | | |
|
5.44%
|
| |
| | • Directors and Nominees | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Mark R. DeFazio | | | |
|
166,113
|
| | | |
|
1.35%
|
| |
| | Anthony J. Fabiano | | | |
|
15,180
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | Dale C. Fredston | | | |
|
16,668
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | David J. Gold | | | |
|
29,731
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | Harvey M. Gutman | | | |
|
21,243
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | Terence J. Mitchell | | | |
|
15,730
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | Chaya Pamula | | | |
|
11,513
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | Robert C. Patent | | | |
|
101,185
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | Maria F. Ramirez | | | |
|
35,557(4)
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | William Reinhardt | | | |
|
23,780
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | Katrina Robinson | | | |
|
7,500
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | George J. Wolf, Jr. | | | |
|
28,495
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | • Named Executive Officers | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Laura Capra | | | |
|
40,989
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | Scott Lublin | | | |
|
60,930
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | Nick Rosenberg | | | |
|
24,452(5)
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | Daniel F. Dougherty | | | |
|
31,767
|
| | | |
|
*
|
| |
| | All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons) | | | |
|
675,683
|
| | | |
|
5.50%
|
| |
| |
|
| |
DATE
|
| |
|
| |
VIRTUAL MEETING
|
| |
|
| |
RECORD DATE
|
|
| |
April 29, 2026
9:00 a.m. Eastern Time |
| | Go online to www.meetnow.global/MWTWSXQ | | |
March 4, 2026
|
| |||||||||
| |
Q
|
| |
Who can attend the Annual Meeting? How do I attend?
|
|
| |
A
|
| |
Only stockholders of record of our common stock at the close of business on March 4, 2026, the Record Date, have a right to attend the Annual Meeting, which will be held on April 29, 2026 at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time.
The Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual meeting format only. You will not be able to attend the annual meeting physically. To be admitted to the Annual Meeting, you must go online to www.meetnow.global/MWTWSXQ. To login to the virtual meeting, you must join as a “Shareholder” and follow the applicable instructions set forth below under “How do I register for the Annual Meeting?”
The virtual meeting platform is fully supported across browsers (MS Edge, Firefox, Chrome and Safari) and devices (desktops, laptops, tablets and cell phones) running the most up-to-date version of applicable software and plugins. Please note that Internet Explorer is not a supported browser. You should ensure that you have a strong internet connection wherever you intend to participate in the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to access the Annual Meeting prior to the start time. For further assistance, should you need it, you may call (888) 724-2416.
|
|
| |
Q
|
| |
How do I register for the Annual Meeting?
|
|
| |
A
|
| |
If you are a registered stockholder (i.e., you hold your shares through our transfer agent, Computershare), you do not need to register to attend the Annual Meeting virtually on the Internet. To attend the meeting, you must go online to www.meetnow.global/MWTWSXQ, join as a “Shareholder” and enter the control number found on your proxy card.
If you hold your shares through an intermediary, such as a bank or broker, and you wish to participate at the Annual Meeting, you must register in advance. To register to attend the Annual Meeting you must submit proof of your proxy power (legal proxy) reflecting your shares along with your name and email address to Computershare. Requests for registration must be labeled as “Legal Proxy” and be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on Thursday, April 23, 2026. You will receive a confirmation of your registration by email after Computershare receives your registration materials.
Proof of proxy power and registration requests should be directed to Computershare at the following:
|
|
| |
BY EMAIL
|
| | |
Forward the email from your broker
granting you a legal proxy, or attach an image of your legal proxy, to [email protected] |
| |
BY MAIL
|
| | |
Computershare
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. Legal Proxy P.O. Box 43001 Providence, RI 02940-3001 |
|
| |
Q
|
| |
Who can vote at the Annual Meeting?
|
|
| |
A
|
| | Only stockholders as of the Record Date, March 4, 2026, may vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, we had 12,293,174 shares of common stock outstanding. You are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock that you owned on the Record Date. The shares of common stock held in our treasury will not be voted. Please see “What if I am a ‘beneficial owner’?” below for information on providing voting instructions if you hold your shares of common stock through a broker, bank or other nominee. | |
| |
Q
|
| |
What is a proxy?
|
|
| |
A
|
| | Your proxy gives us authority to vote your shares and tells us how to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment thereof. The individuals designated as “proxies” or “proxy holders” are named on the proxy card and will vote your shares at the Annual Meeting according to the instructions you give on the proxy card or by telephone or over the Internet. | |
| |
Q
|
| |
How are proxy materials being distributed?
|
|
| |
A
|
| | We anticipate that the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the Proxy Statement will begin being mailed to stockholders on or about March 20, 2026. | |
| |
Q
|
| |
How do I vote? What are the different ways I can vote my shares?
|
|
| |
A
|
| | If you are a stockholder of record (that is, you hold your shares of our common stock in your own name), you may vote your shares by using any of the following methods: | |
|
|
BY SUBMITTING A PROXY BY INTERNET
|
| |
|
| |
BY SUBMITTING A PROXY BY TELEPHONE
|
| ||
| |
To submit a proxy by Internet prior to the Annual Meeting, use the Internet site listed on the proxy card. The Internet voting procedures, as set forth on the proxy card, are designed to authenticate your identity, to allow you to provide your voting instructions and to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote by Internet, you should not return your proxy card.
|
| |
To submit a proxy by telephone, call the toll-free number listed on the proxy card. The telephone voting procedures, as set forth on the proxy card, are designed to authenticate your identity, to allow you to provide your voting instructions and to confirm that your instructions have been properly recorded. If you vote by telephone, you should not return your proxy card.
|
| ||||||
| |
|
| |
BY SUBMITTING A PROXY BY MAIL
|
| |
|
| |
VIRTUALLY AT THE ANNUAL MEETING
|
|
| |
To submit a proxy by mail, complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope provided to you.
|
| |
If you are a registered stockholder or hold a proxy from a registered stockholder (and meet other requirements as described in “Who can attend the Annual Meeting? How do I attend?” above), you may attend the Annual Meeting virtually and vote on the meeting website.
|
| ||||||
| |
Q
|
| |
What if I am a “beneficial owner”?
|
|
| |
A
|
| |
If you are a “beneficial owner,” also known as a “street name” holder (that is, you hold your shares of our common stock through a broker, bank or other nominee), you will receive instructions on how to vote at the Annual Meeting (including, if your broker, bank or other nominee elects to do so, instructions on how to vote your shares by telephone or over the Internet) as part of your proxy materials provided by the record holder. You must follow those instructions to be able to attend the Annual Meeting and have your shares voted.
If you give the broker instructions, your shares will be voted as you direct. If you do not give instructions, one of two things can happen depending on the type of proposal. For the ratification of the appointment of Crowe LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2026 (Proposal 3), the broker may vote your shares in its discretion. For all other proposals, the broker may not vote your shares at all if you do not give instructions (a “broker non-vote”). As a result, if you hold your shares in “street name” your shares will only be voted on Proposals 1, 2, and 4 if you give instructions to your broker.
|
|
| |
Q
|
| | If I vote by proxy, how will my shares be voted? What if I submit a proxy without indicating how to vote my shares? |
|
| |
A
|
| | If you vote by proxy through mail, telephone or over the Internet, your shares will be voted in accordance with your instructions. If you sign, date and return your proxy card without indicating how you want to vote your shares, the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with the recommendations of the Board. Please see “How does the Board recommend that I vote?” below for additional information. | |
| |
Q
|
| |
What if I want to revoke my proxy?
|
|
| |
A
|
| |
You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the Annual Meeting and all adjournments thereof by:
(i)
sending written notice of revocation to the Corporate Secretary of Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp. at 99 Park Avenue, 12th Floor, New York, New York, 10016,
(ii)
submitting another signed proxy card with a later date, or
(iii)
by virtually attending the Annual Meeting and voting during the meeting on the meeting website.
Please note that your virtual attendance at the Annual Meeting will not revoke your proxy unless you vote on the meeting website at the appropriate time during the Annual Meeting.
|
|
| |
Q
|
| |
What is a quorum?
|
|
| |
A
|
| | A quorum is the minimum number of shares required to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. The presence virtually or by proxy of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted to determine whether a quorum is present. | |
| |
Q
|
| |
What matters are being considered at the Annual Meeting?
|
|
| |
A
|
| |
The purpose of the Annual Meeting is to:
1.
vote to elect four directors (Proposal 1),
2.
approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executive Officers for 2025
(Proposal 2),
3.
ratify the appointment of Crowe LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2026 (Proposal 3), and
4.
approve the ESPP (Proposal 4).
You may be asked to vote on other matters that may properly be submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting. The Company could adjourn or postpone the Annual Meeting for the purpose of, among other things, allowing additional time to solicit proxies.
|
|
| |
Proposal
|
| |
Board
Recommendation |
| |
Voting
Options |
| |
Vote Required
|
| |
Effect of Abstentions
and Broker Non-Votes |
| ||||||
| |
1.
|
| |
Election of four directors to serve on our Board of Directors for a three-year term ending at the 2029 Annual Meeting
|
| |
|
| |
FOR each director nominee
|
| |
•
FOR
•
WITHHOLD
|
| |
•
a plurality of the votes cast (i.e., individuals who receive the highest number of ‘FOR’ votes cast are elected)
|
| |
•
No effect
|
|
| |
2.
|
| |
Approval of a non-binding advisory vote regarding the 2025 compensation of our Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement (“Say-on-Pay” vote)
|
| |
|
| |
FOR
|
| |
•
FOR
•
AGAINST
•
ABSTAIN
|
| |
•
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast
|
| |
•
No effect
|
|
| |
3.
|
| |
Ratification of the appointment of Crowe LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2026
|
| |
|
| |
FOR
|
| |
•
FOR
•
AGAINST
•
ABSTAIN
|
| |
•
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast
|
| |
•
No effect
|
|
| |
4.
|
| |
Approval of the ESPP
|
| |
|
| |
FOR
|
| |
•
FOR
•
AGAINST
•
ABSTAIN
|
| |
•
the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast
|
| |
•
No effect
|
|
| |
Q
|
| |
How may I vote for each proposal?
|
|
| |
A
|
| | You may vote “for” any director nominee proposed by the Board or “withhold” authority to vote for any director nominee being proposed (Proposal 1). For all other proposals, you may vote “for” the proposal, vote “against” the proposal, or “abstain” from voting on such proposal. | |
| |
Q
|
| |
What vote is required for approval of a proposal at the Annual Meeting?
|
|
| |
A
|
| |
A director nominee will be elected if a plurality of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting are “for” a director’s election. “Plurality” means that individuals who receive the highest number of votes cast are elected, up to the maximum number of directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting.
All other matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting require the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast virtually or by proxy at the Annual Meeting.
|
|
| |
Q
|
| |
What is the effect of abstentions and broker non-votes?
|
|
| |
A
|
| | Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the vote for any of the four proposals being considered at the Annual Meeting. | |
| |
Q
|
| |
How does the Board recommend that I vote?
|
| |||
| |
A
|
| |
The Board has determined that the matters to be considered at the Annual Meeting are in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders and unanimously recommends a vote:
|
| |||
| | | | |
|
| |
“FOR” the election of the director nominees (Proposal 1);
|
|
| | | | |
|
| |
“FOR” the compensation of the Named Executive Officers for 2025 (Proposal 2);
|
|
| | | | |
|
| |
“FOR” the ratification of the appointment of Crowe LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2026 (Proposal 3); and
|
|
| | | | |
|
| |
“FOR” the approval of the ESPP (Proposal 4).
|
|
| |
|
| | |
Metropolitan Bank Holding Corp.
99 Park Avenue, 12th Floor New York, New York 10016 |
| |
|
| | |
(212) 365-6721
|
| |
|
| | | |
| |
Tangible Book Value Per Share
(Dollars in Thousands, except per share data) |
| |
For Year Ending
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
2025
|
| |
2024
|
| |
2023
|
| |
2022
|
| |
2021
|
| |
2020
|
| |
2019
|
| |
2018
|
| |
2017
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Tangible common equity (GAAP) | | | |
|
733,379
|
| | | |
|
720,094
|
| | | |
|
649,288
|
| | | |
|
566,164
|
| | | |
|
547,256
|
| | | |
|
325,552
|
| | | |
|
283,889
|
| | | |
|
249,282
|
| | | |
|
221,649
|
| |
| | Common shares outstanding | | | |
|
10,088,617
|
| | | |
|
11,197,625
|
| | | |
|
11,062,729
|
| | | |
|
10,949,965
|
| | | |
|
10,920,569
|
| | | |
|
8,295,272
|
| | | |
|
8,312,918
|
| | | |
|
8,217,274
|
| | | |
|
8,196,310
|
| |
| | Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP) | | | |
|
72.69
|
| | | |
|
64.31
|
| | | |
|
58.69
|
| | | |
|
51.70
|
| | | |
|
50.11
|
| | | |
|
39.25
|
| | | |
|
34.15
|
| | | |
|
30.34
|
| | | |
|
27.04
|
| |
| |
2025 Adjusted Net Income (Dollars in millions)
|
| |
Net Income
Adjustments |
| |||
| | Net Income before income tax expense (GAAP) | | | |
|
101.5
|
| |
| | Adjustments for: | | | | | | | |
| |
Digital Transformation expenses
|
| | |
|
7.4
|
| |
| | Adjusted Pre-tax net income | | | |
|
108.9
|
| |
| | Estimated Tax rate | | | |
|
30.0%
|
| |
| | Adjusted Net Income | | | |
|
76.2
|
| |
| |
2025 Return on Average Tangible Common Equity (Dollars in millions)
|
| |
Average
Tangible Common Equity Adjustments |
| |||
| | Average common equity (GAAP) | | | |
|
732.6
|
| |
| | Less: Average intangible assets | | | |
|
9.7
|
| |
| | Average tangible common equity | | | |
|
722.9
|
| |
| | Net Income | | | |
|
71.1
|
| |
| | Divided by: Average tangible common equity | | | |
|
722.9
|
| |
| | ROATCE | | | |
|
9.8%
|
| |
| |
2025 Adjusted Return Average Tangible Common Equity (Dollars in millions)
|
| |
Average
Common Equity Adjustments |
| |||
| | Average common equity (GAAP) | | | |
|
732.6
|
| |
| | Less: average intangible assets | | | |
|
9.7
|
| |
| | Average tangible common equity | | | |
|
722.9
|
| |
| | Adjusted Net Income | | | |
|
76.2
|
| |
| | Divided by: Average Tangible Common Equity | | | |
|
722.9
|
| |
| | Adjusted ROATCE | | | |
|
10.5%
|
| |
| |
Pre-Tax, Pre-Provision Net
Revenue (Dollars in Thousands, except per share data) |
| |
For Year Ending
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |
2025
|
| |
2024
|
| |
2023
|
| |
2022
|
| |
2021
|
| |
2020
|
| |
2019
|
| |
2018
|
| |
2017
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Total Revenue (GAAP) | | | |
|
315,106
|
| | | |
|
276,913
|
| | | |
|
250,739
|
| | | |
|
255,751
|
| | | |
|
180,698
|
| | | |
|
141,924
|
| | | |
|
108,239
|
| | | |
|
83,177
|
| | | |
|
63,382
|
| |
| | Less: Non-interest expense | | | |
|
176,005
|
| | | |
|
173,575
|
| | | |
|
131,538
|
| | | |
|
148,737
|
| | | |
|
87,312
|
| | | |
|
74,518
|
| | | |
|
59,955
|
| | | |
|
43,471
|
| | | |
|
32,745
|
| |
| | Less: Gain (loss) on sale of securities | | | |
|
674
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
609
|
| | | |
|
3,286
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| | | |
|
(37)
|
| | | |
|
—
|
| |
| | Pre-tax, pre-provision net revenue (non-GAAP) | | | |
|
138,427
|
| | | |
|
103,338
|
| | | |
|
119,201
|
| | | |
|
107,014
|
| | | |
|
92,777
|
| | | |
|
64,120
|
| | | |
|
48,284
|
| | | |
|
39,743
|
| | | |
|
30,637
|
| |